These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12500817)

  • 1. Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
    van Prooijen JW; van den Bos K; Wilke HA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1353-61. PubMed ID: 12500817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness.
    van den Bos K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jun; 80(6):931-41. PubMed ID: 11414375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the subjective quality of social justice: the role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments.
    van den Bos K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Sep; 85(3):482-98. PubMed ID: 14498784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reactions to decisions with uncertain consequences: reliance on perceived fairness versus predicted outcomes depends on knowledge.
    See KE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):104-18. PubMed ID: 19210067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedural justice and the hedonic principle: how approach versus avoidance motivation influences the psychology of voice.
    van Prooijen JW; Karremans JC; van Beest I
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Oct; 91(4):686-97. PubMed ID: 17014293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients.
    Heuer L; Penrod S; Kattan A
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Dec; 31(6):573-610. PubMed ID: 17245632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgments of an authority's responsibility.
    Brockner J; Fishman AY; Reb J; Goldman B; Spiegel S; Garden C
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1657-71. PubMed ID: 18020803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.
    De Cremer D; Tyler TR
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 17484547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Procedural justice as autonomy regulation.
    van Prooijen JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1166-80. PubMed ID: 19469594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Group belongingness and procedural justice: social inclusion and exclusion by peers affects the psychology of voice.
    van Prooijen JW; van den Bos K; Wilke HA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jul; 87(1):66-79. PubMed ID: 15250793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A four-component model of procedural justice: defining the meaning of a "fair" process.
    Blader SL; Tyler TR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Jun; 29(6):747-58. PubMed ID: 15189630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the motivational effects of procedural and informational justice in feedback processes.
    Roberson QM; Stewart MM
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Aug; 97(Pt 3):281-98. PubMed ID: 16848943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of national culture on the perceived fairness of grading procedures: a comparison of the United States and China.
    Tata J
    J Psychol; 2005 Sep; 139(5):401-12. PubMed ID: 16285211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects.
    van Dijke M; De Cremer D; Mayer DM
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 May; 95(3):488-502. PubMed ID: 20476828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rewarding leadership and fair procedures as determinants of self-esteem.
    De Cremer D; van Knippenberg B; van Knippenberg D; Mullenders D; Stinglhamber F
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jan; 90(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 15641886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome fairness and procedural fairness.
    Bianchi EC; Brockner J; van den Bos K; Seifert M; Moon H; van Dijke M; De Cremer D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 25387762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fairness as partiality aversion: the development of procedural justice.
    Shaw A; Olson K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Mar; 119():40-53. PubMed ID: 24291349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Organizational justice and health; review of evidence.
    Elovainio M; Heponiemi T; Sinervo T; Magnavita N
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2010; 32(3 Suppl B):B5-9. PubMed ID: 21299075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Focus theory of normative conduct and terror-management theory: the interactive impact of mortality salience and norm salience on social judgment.
    Jonas E; Martens A; Kayser DN; Fritsche I; Sullivan D; Greenberg J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Dec; 95(6):1239-51. PubMed ID: 19025281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Realpolitik versus fair process: moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions.
    Leung K; Tong KK; Lind EA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 17352604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.