These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12501137)
1. Modulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. Ogawa T; Sukotjo C; Nishimura I J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 11(4):241-7. PubMed ID: 12501137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes. Ogawa T; Nishimura I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 12705297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of bone morphogenetic protein-2 on rat intervertebral disc cells in vitro. Tim Yoon S; Su Kim K; Li J; Soo Park J; Akamaru T; Elmer WA; Hutton WC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1773-80. PubMed ID: 12923462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interfacial shear strength of endosseous implants. Butz F; Ogawa T; Nishimura I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):746-51. PubMed ID: 21841983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-throughput gene expression analysis in bone healing around titanium implants by DNA microarray. Kojima N; Ozawa S; Miyata Y; Hasegawa H; Tanaka Y; Ogawa T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Feb; 19(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 18184341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits. Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Barewal RM; Oates TW; Meredith N; Cochran DL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):641-51. PubMed ID: 14579951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium. Att W; Tsukimura N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 17974105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nanostructured alumina-coated implant surface: effect on osteoblast-related gene expression and bone-to-implant contact in vivo. Mendonça G; Mendonça DB; Simões LG; Araújo AL; Leite ER; Duarte WR; Cooper LF; Aragão FJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 19492635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new animal model for molecular biological analysis of the implant-tissue interface: spatial expression of type XII collagen mRNA around a titanium oral implant. Karimbux NY; Sirakian A; Weber HP; Nishimura I J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):107-13; discussion 114-5. PubMed ID: 8699501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: a comparative study in rabbits. Baker D; London RM; O'Neal R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):722-8. PubMed ID: 10531744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Topical application of statin affects bone healing around implants. Moriyama Y; Ayukawa Y; Ogino Y; Atsuta I; Koyano K Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 18422989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of ultraviolet photoactivation of titanium on osseointegration in a rat model. Ueno T; Yamada M; Hori N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 20369086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: a histologic study in rats. Marinho VC; Celletti R; Bracchetti G; Petrone G; Minkin C; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 12608672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increased bone formation around coated implants. Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface-etching enhances titanium implant osseointegration in newly formed (rhBMP-2-induced) and native bone. Qahash M; Hardwick WR; Rohrer MD; Wozney JM; Wikesjö UM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 17622015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog. Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]