These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12501849)

  • 1. Minimally invasive bypass surgery.
    Wood WC
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Dec; 347(26):2165-8; author reply 2165-8. PubMed ID: 12501849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Angioplasty versus minimally invasive bypass surgery.
    MacGillivray TE; Vlahakes GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Aug; 347(8):551-2. PubMed ID: 12192012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive bypass surgery.
    LoGerfo FW
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Dec; 347(26):2165-8; author reply 2165-8. PubMed ID: 12501846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive bypass surgery.
    Drenth DJ; Veeger NJ; Boonstra PW
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Dec; 347(26):2165-8; author reply 2165-8. PubMed ID: 12501231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preliminary experience with minimally invasive coronary-artery bypass surgery combined with coronary angioplasty.
    Friedrich GJ; Bonatti J; Dapunt OE
    N Engl J Med; 1997 May; 336(20):1454-5. PubMed ID: 9148150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery.
    Jaffery Z; Kowalski M; Weaver WD; Khanal S
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 17300948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Left main coronary stenting is safe and effective and is a valuable alternative to coronary artery bypass graft surgery].
    Sheiban I; Zoccai GB; Moretti C
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2009 Feb; 10(2):113-7; discussion 117. PubMed ID: 19348149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative economic analyses of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Gray DT; Veenstra DL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Mar; 125(3):618-24. PubMed ID: 12658204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive coronary bypass for protected left main coronary stenosis angioplasty.
    Mack MJ; Brown DL; Sankaran A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1997 Aug; 64(2):545-6. PubMed ID: 9262614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus stenting.
    Takagi H; Kato T; Matsuno Y; Umemoto T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 29(4):632; author reply 633. PubMed ID: 16473513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive heart surgery.
    SoRelle R
    Circulation; 1997 Oct; 96(8):2483-4. PubMed ID: 9355878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. More on "hybrid revascularization".
    Bonchek LI
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Sep; 337(12):861-2. PubMed ID: 9297126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting practices for three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease. Insights from the SYNTAX run-in phase.
    Kappetein AP; Dawkins KD; Mohr FW; Morice MC; Mack MJ; Russell ME; Pomar J; Serruys PW
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 29(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 16497510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hybrid coronary revascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents.
    Murphy GJ; Bryan AJ; Angelini GD
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Nov; 78(5):1861-7. PubMed ID: 15511503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Halkos ME; Puskas JD
    Surg Clin North Am; 2009 Aug; 89(4):913-22, ix. PubMed ID: 19782844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coronary-artery stents.
    Taggart DP
    N Engl J Med; 2006 May; 354(19):2076-8; author reply 2076-8. PubMed ID: 16696146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials.
    Mercado N; Wijns W; Serruys PW; Sigwart U; Flather MD; Stables RH; O'Neill WW; Rodriguez A; Lemos PA; Hueb WA; Gersh BJ; Booth J; Boersma E
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 130(2):512-9. PubMed ID: 16077421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive coronary surgery at the beginning of the new millennium.
    Mariani MA; Boonstra PW; Grandjean JG; Gu YJ
    Cardiologia; 1998 Sep; 43(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 9859601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The battle of vladimir.
    Hamburger JN; Serruys PW
    Eur Heart J; 2000 Dec; 21(23):1911-3. PubMed ID: 11071794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does off-pump or minimally invasive coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with percutaneous coronary intervention? A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Bainbridge D; Cheng D; Martin J; Novick R;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 133(3):623-31. PubMed ID: 17320555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.