These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12502039)

  • 1. Localization accuracy of single current dipoles from tangential components of auditory evoked fields.
    Kwon H; Lee YH; Kim JM; Park YK; Kuriki S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Dec; 47(23):4145-54. PubMed ID: 12502039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intersession replicability of dipole parameters from three components of the auditory evoked magnetic field.
    Baumann SB; Rogers RL; Papanicolaou AC; Saydjari CL
    Brain Topogr; 1990; 3(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 2091714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Localization of auditory response sources using magnetoencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Papanicolaou AC; Baumann S; Rogers RL; Saydjari C; Amparo EG; Eisenberg HM
    Arch Neurol; 1990 Jan; 47(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 2294891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the amplitude/intensity function of the auditory evoked N1m and N1 components.
    Neukirch M; Hegerl U; Kötitz R; Dorn H; Gallinat J; Herrmann WM
    Neuropsychobiology; 2002; 45(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11803241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The 3D topography of MEG source localization accuracy: effects of conductor model and noise.
    Tarkiainen A; Liljeström M; Seppä M; Salmelin R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Oct; 114(10):1977-92. PubMed ID: 14499760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics of the background fields in multichannel-recorded magnetic field responses.
    Kuriki S; Takeuchi F; Kobayashi T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jan; 92(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 7508853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to bandwidth variations of bandpass noise.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):47-54. PubMed ID: 15811698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structure of the auditory evoked magnetic fields during sleep.
    Naka D; Kakigi R; Hoshiyama M; Yamasaki H; Okusa T; Koyama S
    Neuroscience; 1999; 93(2):573-83. PubMed ID: 10465441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to iterated rippled noise.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):256-61. PubMed ID: 15953534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A neuromagnetic study of selective auditory attention.
    Arthur DL; Lewis PS; Medvick PA; Flynn ER
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 May; 78(5):348-60. PubMed ID: 1711454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equivalent dipoles for middle latency auditory evoked potentials using the dipole tracing method.
    Nakagawa M; Yoshikawa H; Ando I; Ichikawa G
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1999 Jul; 26(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 10419031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic anterolateral movement of N100m dipoles in evoked magnetic field reflects activation of isofrequency bands through horizontal fibers in human auditory cortex.
    Ozaki I; Jin YC; Suzuki Y; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Aug; 329(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 12165417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system.
    Nakasato N; Fujita S; Seki K; Kawamura T; Matani A; Tamura I; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Mar; 94(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 7536153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distributed current analyses of bi-hemispheric magnetic N1m responses to ipsi/contralateral monaural stimuli from a single subject.
    Singh KD; Ioannides AA; Gray N; Kober H; Pongratz H; Daun A; Grummich P; Vieth J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jul; 92(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 7517858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One set of sounds, two tonotopic maps: exploring auditory cortex with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Weisz N; Keil A; Wienbruch C; Hoffmeister S; Elbert T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1249-58. PubMed ID: 15134691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Source estimation of spontaneous MEG activity and auditory evoked responses in normal subjects during sleep.
    Iramina K; Ueno S
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 8728422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of center frequency and bandwidth on the auditory evoked magnetic field.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Matsuoka K
    Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 218(1-2):64-71. PubMed ID: 16797895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generators of visual evoked potentials investigated by dipole tracing in the human occipital cortex.
    Ikeda H; Nishijo H; Miyamoto K; Tamura R; Endo S; Ono T
    Neuroscience; 1998 Jun; 84(3):723-39. PubMed ID: 9579779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.