These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12502125)

  • 1. Cephalometric norms for the Chinese: a compilation of existing data.
    Moate SJ; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2002 Mar; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 12502125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 20709723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Steiner's cephalometric norms for the Nepalese population.
    Sharma JN
    J Orthod; 2011 Mar; 38(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 21367825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cephalometric norms of a Burkina Faso population.
    Ouédraogo Y; Benyahia H; Diouf JS; Camara T; Bationo R; Ngom PI
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 30772356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cephalometric investigation of horizontal lip position in adult Nigerians.
    Ikenna Isiekwe G; Olatokunbo DaCosta O; Chukwudi Isiekwe M
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):160-9. PubMed ID: 22984100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft tissue cephalometric norms for a North Indian population group using Legan and Burstone analysis.
    Jain P; Kalra JP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 20965694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of southern Chinese and British Caucasian cephalometric standards.
    Cooke MS; Wei SH
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 2729666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Chinese adults with esthetic facial profiles.
    Lew KK; Ho KK; Keng SB; Ho KH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Nov; 50(11):1184-9; discussion 1189-90. PubMed ID: 1403274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of soft tissue cephalometric norms between Turkish and European-American adults.
    Celebi AA; Tan E; Gelgor IE; Colak T; Ayyildiz E
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():806203. PubMed ID: 23533362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bimaxillary protrusion in the Caucasian: a cephalometric study of the morphological features.
    Keating PJ
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 12(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 3863675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for the Lambada population in Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh.
    Thomas M; Reddy VD; Lakshmi HV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 23059572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
    Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of dentoalveolar protrusion values in Moroccans and other populations.
    Lahlou K; Bahoum A; Makhoukhi MB; Aalloula el H
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 20018796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Racial variation of cephalometric measurements in Hawaii.
    Chung CS; Kau MC; Walker GF
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1982; 2(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 7174781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Lau JW; Hägg U
    Br Dent J; 1999 Feb; 186(4 Spec No):188-90. PubMed ID: 10205956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric Norms in an Omani Adult Population of Arab Descent.
    Govinakovi PS; Al-Busaidi I; Senguttuvan V
    Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2018 May; 18(2):e182-e189. PubMed ID: 30210848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method of cephalometric evaluation.
    McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Dec; 86(6):449-69. PubMed ID: 6594933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rondeau Seminars amalgamated mid-sagittal (lateral) cephalometric analysis.
    Palencar AJ
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(3):15-20. PubMed ID: 25745718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of cephalometric norms between Japanese and Caucasian adults in antero-posterior and vertical dimension.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):493-9. PubMed ID: 17974539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.