207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12502289)
1. Manager's reports of variation in coding accuracy across U.S. oncology centers.
Lorence DP; Spink A; Jameson R
J Oncol Manag; 2002; 11(6):20-6. PubMed ID: 12502289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benchmarking variation in coding accuracy across the United States.
Lorence DP; Ibrahim IA
J Health Care Finance; 2003; 29(4):29-42. PubMed ID: 12908652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing managed care market variation in reports of coding accuracy.
Lorence DP; Spink A; Jameson R
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(4):15-25. PubMed ID: 12561390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of coding data quality of the HCUP National Inpatient Sample.
Berthelsen CL
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):10-23. PubMed ID: 11143275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disparity in coding concordance: do physicians and coders agree?
Lorence DP; Ibrahim IA
J Health Care Finance; 2003; 29(4):43-53. PubMed ID: 12908653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. UB-82 forms offer wealth of information, misinformation.
Gardner E
Mod Healthc; 1990 Sep; 20(38):18-9, 22-9. PubMed ID: 10106206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disparities in health information quality across the rural-urban continuum: where is coded data more reliable?
Lorence D; Chen L
J Med Syst; 2008 Feb; 32(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18333399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multilevel reviews for coding accuracy.
Stavely S
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 11143277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
Silfen E
Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of automated encoders on coding accuracy and coding speed.
Lloyd SS; Layman E
Top Health Inf Manage; 1997 Feb; 17(3):72-9. PubMed ID: 10165389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Case study: clinical documentation improvement program supports coding accuracy.
Danzi JT; Masencup B; Brucker MA; Dixon-Lee C
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):24-9. PubMed ID: 11143276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coding changes '09. Learn what you need to know to cut down on reimbursement hassles.
Martin V
Med Econ; 2008 Dec; 85(23):30-2, 34. PubMed ID: 19209534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Keeping internal chart reviews from being used against you: 11 useful strategies.
Glaser DM
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 15500021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of statistical analysis in assessing appropriate documentation and coding.
Rudman WJ; Hewitt CR
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):41-50. PubMed ID: 11143279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic coding quality and its impact on healthcare reimbursement: research prospectives.
Waterstraat FL; Barlow J; Newman F
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Sep; 61(9):52-9. PubMed ID: 10113309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Managers reports of automated coding system adoption and effects on data quality.
Lorence DP; Jameson R
Methods Inf Med; 2003; 42(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 12874655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical buy-in is key to benchmarking success.
Senn GF
Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 May; 52(5):46-50. PubMed ID: 10179439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coding for effective denial management.
Miller J; Lineberry J
Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 14994832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolution of the uses of ICD-9-CM coding: Medicare risk adjustment methodology for managed care plans.
Tully L; Rulon V
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 11143281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Get your doctors on the coding bandwagon.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2000 Sep; 4(9):129-32. PubMed ID: 11116477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
