These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12503)

  • 1. [Effect of several factors on the process of protein solution ultrafiltration].
    Iaskovich GA; Kaukhova IE; Vorob'eva VIa
    Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol; 1976; 12(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 12503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recovery of protein from poultry processing wastewater using membrane ultrafiltration.
    Lo YM; Cao D; Argin-Soysal S; Wang J; Hahm TS
    Bioresour Technol; 2005 Apr; 96(6):687-98. PubMed ID: 15588771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of solution pH on protein transmission and membrane capacity during virus filtration.
    Bakhshayeshi M; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 May; 100(1):108-17. PubMed ID: 18080342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Application of the ultrafiltration method to the isolation of cholesterol oxidase of microbial origin].
    Petrova LIa; Podsukhina GM; Selezneva AA
    Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol; 1979; 15(6):878-82. PubMed ID: 295116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of ion binding on protein transport through ultrafiltration membranes.
    Menon MK; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 May; 63(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 10099609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immobilization of lipase by ultrafiltration and cross-linking onto the polysulfone membrane surface.
    Yujun W; Jian X; Guangsheng L; Youyuan D
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 May; 99(7):2299-303. PubMed ID: 17591438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective factors in the treatment of kerosene-water emulsion by using UF membranes.
    Rezvanpour A; Roostaazad R; Hesampour M; Nyström M; Ghotbi C
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jan; 161(2-3):1216-24. PubMed ID: 18539388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of protein and solution properties on the Donnan effect during the ultrafiltration of proteins.
    Bolton GR; Boesch AW; Basha J; Lacasse DP; Kelley BD; Acharya H
    Biotechnol Prog; 2011; 27(1):140-52. PubMed ID: 21312362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of chromium from aqueous solution using cellulose acetate and sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) blend ultrafiltration membranes.
    Arthanareeswaran G; Thanikaivelan P; Jaya N; Mohan D; Raajenthiren M
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jan; 139(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 16860465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The optimisation of ultrasonic cleaning procedures for dairy fouled ultrafiltration membranes.
    Muthukumaran S; Kentish S; Lalchandani S; Ashokkumar M; Mawson R; Stevens GW; Grieser F
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2005 Jan; 12(1-2):29-35. PubMed ID: 15474949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Charged ultrafiltration membranes increase the selectivity of whey protein separations.
    Bhushan S; Etzel MR
    J Food Sci; 2009 Apr; 74(3):E131-9. PubMed ID: 19397718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of protein surface morphology on the ultrafiltration flux resistance of bovine serum albumin.
    Elysée-Collen B; Lencki RW
    Biotechnol Prog; 1999; 15(4):732-9. PubMed ID: 10441365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The effect of the sodium-hydrogen composition of the carboxyl cationite KMT on the process of sorption and desorption of the deoxyribonuclease of Actinomyces streptomycini].
    Iaskovich GA; Sholokhova SV; Vorob'eva VIa; Samsonov GV
    Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol; 1974; 10(5):765-8. PubMed ID: 4463367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fractionation of proteins with modified membranes.
    Millesime L; Dulieu J; Chaufer B
    Bioseparation; 1996 Jun; 6(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 8987680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of complex conditions by response surface methodology for APAM-oil/water emulsion removal from aqua solutions using nano-sized TiO2/Al2O3 PVDF ultrafiltration membrane.
    Yi XS; Shi WX; S L Yu ; Ma C; Sun N; Wang S; Jin LM; Sun LP
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Oct; 193():37-44. PubMed ID: 21872396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of coagulation and adsorption on DOC fractions of secondary effluent and resulting fouling behaviour in ultrafiltration.
    Haberkamp J; Ruhl AS; Ernst M; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3794-802. PubMed ID: 17585987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surfactant solutions and porous substrates: spreading and imbibition.
    Starov VM
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2004 Nov; 111(1-2):3-27. PubMed ID: 15571660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of protein fouling during ultrafiltration using a two-layer membrane model.
    Boyd RF; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1998 Aug; 59(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 10099359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fractionation of BSA and myoglobin with modified and unmodified ultrafiltration membranes.
    Ehsani N; Nyström M
    Bioseparation; 1995 Feb; 5(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 7766148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.