These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12503002)

  • 1. Estimating times of surgeries with two component procedures: comparison of the lognormal and normal models.
    Strum DP; May JH; Sampson AR; Vargas LG; Spangler WE
    Anesthesiology; 2003 Jan; 98(1):232-40. PubMed ID: 12503002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling the uncertainty of surgical procedure times: comparison of log-normal and normal models.
    Strum DP; May JH; Vargas LG
    Anesthesiology; 2000 Apr; 92(4):1160-7. PubMed ID: 10754637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling procedure and surgical times for current procedural terminology-anesthesia-surgeon combinations and evaluation in terms of case-duration prediction and operating room efficiency: a multicenter study.
    Stepaniak PS; Heij C; Mannaerts GH; de Quelerij M; de Vries G
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Oct; 109(4):1232-45. PubMed ID: 19762753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgeon and type of anesthesia predict variability in surgical procedure times.
    Strum DP; Sampson AR; May JH; Vargas LG
    Anesthesiology; 2000 May; 92(5):1454-66. PubMed ID: 10781292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating procedure times for surgeries by determining location parameters for the lognormal model.
    Spangler WE; Strum DP; Vargas LG; May JH
    Health Care Manag Sci; 2004 May; 7(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15152974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of procedure classification on process variability and parameter uncertainty of surgical case durations.
    Dexter F; Dexter EU; Ledolter J
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Apr; 110(4):1155-63. PubMed ID: 20357155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the efficiency of the cardiac catheterization laboratories through understanding the stochastic behavior of the scheduled procedures.
    Stepaniak PS; Soliman Hamad MA; Dekker LR; Koolen JJ
    Cardiol J; 2014; 21(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 23990186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The nature and sources of variability in pediatric surgical case duration.
    Bravo F; Levi R; Ferrari LR; McManus ML
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Oct; 25(10):999-1006. PubMed ID: 26184574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Teaching surgery takes time: the impact of surgical education on time in the operating room.
    Vinden C; Malthaner R; McGee J; McClure JA; Winick-Ng J; Liu K; Nash DM; Welk B; Dubois L
    Can J Surg; 2016 Apr; 59(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 27007088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing Policies for Case Scheduling Within 1 Day of Surgery by Markov Chain Models.
    Shi P; Dexter F; Epstein RH
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Feb; 122(2):526-38. PubMed ID: 26797556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sequence-dependent anesthesia-controlled times: a retrospective study in an ophthalmology department of a single-site hospital.
    Luo L; Yao DD; Huang X; You Y; Cheng Y; Shi Y; Liu J; Gong R
    Anesth Analg; 2014 Jul; 119(1):151-162. PubMed ID: 24806141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian prediction bounds and comparisons of operating room times even for procedures with few or no historic data.
    Dexter F; Ledolter J
    Anesthesiology; 2005 Dec; 103(6):1259-167. PubMed ID: 16306741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving operating room schedules.
    Li F; Gupta D; Potthoff S
    Health Care Manag Sci; 2016 Sep; 19(3):261-78. PubMed ID: 25687390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing outpatient appointment scheduling system performance when patient no-show percent and lateness rates are high.
    Barghash M; Saleet H
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 May; 31(4):309-326. PubMed ID: 29790448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical modeling to predict elective surgery time. Comparison with a computer scheduling system and surgeon-provided estimates.
    Wright IH; Kooperberg C; Bonar BA; Bashein G
    Anesthesiology; 1996 Dec; 85(6):1235-45. PubMed ID: 8968169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of interventions influencing or reducing patient waiting while stratifying by surgical procedure.
    Ledolter J; Dexter F
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Apr; 112(4):950-7. PubMed ID: 21385983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What sample sizes are required for pooling surgical case durations among facilities to decrease the incidence of procedures with little historical data?
    Dexter F; Traub RD; Fleisher LA; Rock P
    Anesthesiology; 2002 May; 96(5):1230-6. PubMed ID: 11981165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of simulation to assess a statistically driven surgical scheduling system.
    Kougias P; Tiwari V; Berger DH
    J Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 201(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 27020812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic updating of times remaining in surgical cases using bayesian analysis of historical case duration data and "instant messaging" updates from anesthesia providers.
    Dexter F; Epstein RH; Lee JD; Ledolter J
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Mar; 108(3):929-40. PubMed ID: 19224806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.