BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12503780)

  • 1. Control of leg-powered paraplegic cycling using stimulation of the lumbo-sacral anterior spinal nerve roots.
    Perkins TA; de N Donaldson N; Hatcher NA; Swain ID; Wood DE
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2002 Sep; 10(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 12503780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Control strategies for integration of electric motor assist and functional electrical stimulation in paraplegic cycling: utility for exercise testing and mobile cycling.
    Hunt KJ; Stone B; Negård NO; Schauer T; Fraser MH; Cathcart AJ; Ferrario C; Ward SA; Grant S
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2004 Mar; 12(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 15068192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of an indoor rowing machine with manual FES controller for total body exercise in paraplegia.
    Davoodi R; Andrews BJ; Wheeler GD; Lederer R
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2002 Sep; 10(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 12503785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test bed with force-measuring crank for static and dynamic investigations on cycling by means of functional electrical stimulation.
    Gföhler M; Angeli T; Eberharter T; Lugner P; Mayr W; Hofer C
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2001 Jun; 9(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 11474970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of epimysial stimulating electrodes in the lower extremities of individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Uhlir JP; Triolo RJ; Davis JA; Bieri C
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2004 Jun; 12(2):279-87. PubMed ID: 15218941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The electrical stimulation bicycle: a neuroprosthesis for the everyday use of paraplegic patients].
    Szecsi J; Fiegel M; Krafczyk S; Straube A; Quintern J; Brandt T
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2004 Jun; 146(26):37-8, 40-1. PubMed ID: 15529690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic simulation of FES-cycling: influence of individual parameters.
    Gföhler M; Lugner P
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2004 Dec; 12(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 15614995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cycling for children with neuromuscular impairments using electrical stimulation--development of tricycle-based systems.
    McRae CG; Johnston TE; Lauer RT; Tokay AM; Lee SC; Hunt KJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jul; 31(6):650-9. PubMed ID: 19196537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulation of shank muscles during functional electrical stimulation cycling increases ankle excursion in individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Fornusek C; Davis GM; Baek I
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 93(11):1930-6. PubMed ID: 22634232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized controlled trial on the effects of cycling with and without electrical stimulation on cardiorespiratory and vascular health in children with spinal cord injury.
    Johnston TE; Smith BT; Mulcahey MJ; Betz RR; Lauer RT
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Aug; 90(8):1379-88. PubMed ID: 19651272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The sacral LION procedure for recovery of bladder/rectum/sexual functions in paraplegic patients after explantation of a previous Finetech-Brindley controller.
    Possover M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 19110191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deafferentation of the urinary bladder and implantation of a sacral anterior root stimulator (SARS) for treatment of the neurogenic bladder in paraplegic patients.
    Seif C; Jünemann KP; Braun PM
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Apr; 49(4):88-92. PubMed ID: 15171588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of stimulating lower leg muscles on the mechanical work and metabolic response in functional electrically stimulated pedaling.
    Hakansson NA; Hull ML
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2010 Oct; 18(5):498-504. PubMed ID: 20529755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of stimulation patterns for FES-cycling using measures of oxygen cost and stimulation cost.
    Hunt KJ; Ferrario C; Grant S; Stone B; McLean AN; Fraser MH; Allan DB
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Sep; 28(7):710-8. PubMed ID: 16298543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of sacral anterior root stimulator on bowel dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury.
    Vallès M; Rodríguez A; Borau A; Mearin F
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 May; 52(5):986-92. PubMed ID: 19502867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the efficiency of FES cycling: a framework and systematic review.
    Hunt KJ; Fang J; Saengsuwan J; Grob M; Laubacher M
    Technol Health Care; 2012; 20(5):395-422. PubMed ID: 23079945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in spastic muscle tone increase in patients with spinal cord injury using functional electrical stimulation and passive leg movements.
    Krause P; Szecsi J; Straube A
    Clin Rehabil; 2008 Jul; 22(7):627-34. PubMed ID: 18586814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiorespiratory, metabolic, and biomechanical responses during functional electrical stimulation leg exercise: health and fitness benefits.
    Davis GM; Hamzaid NA; Fornusek C
    Artif Organs; 2008 Aug; 32(8):625-9. PubMed ID: 18782133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulation parameter optimization for functional electrical stimulation assisted gait in human spinal cord injury using response surface methodology.
    Kim Y; Schmit BD; Youm Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):485-94. PubMed ID: 16488061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of load during electrical stimulation training in spinal cord injury.
    Crameri RM; Cooper P; Sinclair PJ; Bryant G; Weston A
    Muscle Nerve; 2004 Jan; 29(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 14694505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.