These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12504970)
21. Prostaglandin gel versus oxytocin - prelabour rupture of membranes at term - A randomised controlled trial. Mahomed K; Wild K; Weekes CR Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Dec; 58(6):654-659. PubMed ID: 29468633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Induction of labour with a favourable cervix and/or pre-labour rupture of membranes. Crane JM; Young DC Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Oct; 17(5):795-809. PubMed ID: 12972015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Jozwiak M; Dodd JM Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD009792. PubMed ID: 23543582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ruptured membranes at term: randomized, double-blind trial of oral misoprostol for labor induction. Lo JY; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Apr; 101(4):685-9. PubMed ID: 12681871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term. Shetty A; Livingstone I; Acharya S; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The MisoPROM study: a multicenter randomized comparison of oral misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term. Mozurkewich E; Horrocks J; Daley S; Von Oeyen P; Halvorson M; Johnson M; Zaretsky M; Tehranifar M; Bayer-Zwirello L; Robichaux A; Droste S; Turner G; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 189(4):1026-30. PubMed ID: 14586349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term--no advantage of delaying induction for 24 hours. Akyol D; Mungan T; Unsal A; Yüksel K Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 39(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 10554936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficacy comparison of titrated oral solution of misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin on labour induction in women with full-term pregnancy. Kashanian M; Eshraghi N; Rahimi M; Sheikhansari N; Javanmanesh F J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 31195867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a randomised trial. Kwon JS; Davies GA; Mackenzie VP BJOG; 2001 Jan; 108(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 11212999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term. Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Oral Misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol followed by oxytocin for labour induction in women with hypertension in pregnancy (MOLI): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Bracken H; Lightly K; Mundle S; Kerr R; Faragher B; Easterling T; Leigh S; Turner M; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jul; 21(1):537. PubMed ID: 34325670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Oral misoprostol vs. intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Al-Hussaini TK; Abdel-Aal SA; Youssef MA Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jul; 82(1):73-5. PubMed ID: 12834947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD000941. PubMed ID: 12535398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial. Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Dare MR; Middleton P; Crowther CA; Flenady VJ; Varatharaju B Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jan; (1):CD005302. PubMed ID: 16437525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sublingual compared with oral misoprostol in term labour induction: a randomised controlled trial. Shetty A; Mackie L; Danielian P; Rice P; Templeton A BJOG; 2002 Jun; 109(6):645-50. PubMed ID: 12118642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative evaluation of 50 microgram oral misoprostol and 25 microgram intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a randomized trial. Rahman H; Pradhan A; Kharka L; Renjhen P; Kar S; Dutta S J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 May; 35(5):408-416. PubMed ID: 23756271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: a randomized control trial. Cheung PC; Yeo EL; Wong KS; Tang LC Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1128-33. PubMed ID: 16929421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Labour induction at term--a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone. Matonhodze BB; Hofmeyr GJ; Levin J S Afr Med J; 2003 May; 93(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 12830603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial. Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]