492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12507007)
1. Failure to find evidence of stimulus generalization within pictorial categories in pigeons.
Sutton JE; Roberts WA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 12507007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia).
Makino H; Jitsumori M
J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 17324072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of stimulus manipulations on visual categorization in pigeons.
Lazareva OF; Freiburger KL; Wasserman EA
Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 16616817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Degree of representation of the matching concept in pigeons (Columba livia).
Colombo M; Cottle A; Frost N
J Comp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 117(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 14498800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent.
Astley SL; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Oct; 25(4):415-32. PubMed ID: 10531658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conditional same-different discrimination by pigeons: acquisition and generalization to novel and few-item displays.
Castro L; Kennedy PL; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 20141315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pigeons can discriminate "good" and "bad" paintings by children.
Watanabe S
Anim Cogn; 2010 Jan; 13(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19533184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transfer to intermediate forms following concept discrimination by pigeons: chimeras and morphs.
Ghosh N; Lea SE; Noury M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 15540501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Labeling and family resemblance in the discrimination of polymorphous categories by pigeons.
Nicholls E; Ryan CM; Bryant CM; Lea SE
Anim Cogn; 2011 Jan; 14(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 20652343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential outcomes facilitate same/different concept learning.
Schmidtke KA; Katz JS; Wright AA
Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):583-9. PubMed ID: 19937079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus control during conditional discrimination.
Yarczower M
J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 5142389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stimulus control by same-versus-different relations among multiple visual stimuli.
Wasserman EA; Frank AJ; Young ME
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):347-57. PubMed ID: 12395492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Some tests of response membership in acquired equivalence classes.
Urcuioli PJ; Lionello-DeNolf K; Michalek S; Vasconcelos M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 16903494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Task specificity in nonspecific transfer and in extradimensional stimulus generalization in pigeons.
Rodgers JP; Thomas DR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1982 Oct; 8(4):301-12. PubMed ID: 7175443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians.
Wright AA; Katz JS
Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):234-54. PubMed ID: 16621333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Natural categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons.
Huber L; Troje NF; Loidolt M; Aust U; Grass D
Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Nov; 53(4):341-57. PubMed ID: 11131790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Transitive inference" in multiple conditional discriminations.
Higa JJ; Staddon JE
J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Mar; 59(2):265-91. PubMed ID: 8454956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pigeons (Columba livia) associate time intervals with symbols in a touch screen task: evidence for ordinality but not summation.
Olthof A; Santi A
J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 17324078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity.
Ernst AJ; Engberg L; Thomas DR
J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Sep; 16(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 5121854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
