These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12507019)
1. The competition-among-relations-in-nominals theory of conceptual combination: implications for stimulus class formation and class expansion. Gagné CL J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):551-65. PubMed ID: 12507019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CARIN theory reanalysis reanalyzed: a comment on Maguire, Devereux, Costello, and Cater (2007). Spalding TL; Gagné CL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1573-8. PubMed ID: 18980417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A reanalysis of the CARIN theory of conceptual combination. Maguire P; Devereux B; Costello F; Cater A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):811-21. PubMed ID: 17576155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conceptual and linguistic representations of kinds and classes. Prasada S; Hennefield L; Otap D Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(7):1224-50. PubMed ID: 22671567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Gagné CL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):236-54. PubMed ID: 11204100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of interactional semantic patterns on the interpretation of noun-noun compounds. Maguire P; Maguire R; Cater AW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):288-97. PubMed ID: 20192532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relation availability was not confounded with familiarity or plausibility in Gagné and Shoben (1997): Comment on Wisniewski and Murphy (2005). Gagné CL; Spalding TL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1431-7; discussion 1438-42. PubMed ID: 17087595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distinctiveness and correlation in conceptual structure: behavioral and computational studies. Randall B; Moss HE; Rodd JM; Greer M; Tyler LK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):393-406. PubMed ID: 14979813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using relations within conceptual systems to translate across conceptual systems. Goldstone RL; Rogosky BJ Cognition; 2002 Jul; 84(3):295-320. PubMed ID: 12044737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency of relation type as a determinant of conceptual combination: a reanalysis. Wisniewski EJ; Murphy GL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jan; 31(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 15641914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interactive property attribution in concept combination. Estes Z; Glucksberg S Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 10714135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Familiarity and relational preference in the understanding of noun--noun compounds. Tagalakis G; Keane MT Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1285-97. PubMed ID: 17225509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semantic relations as graded concepts. Caplan LJ; Herrmann DJ Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1993; 201(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 8098173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An asymmetric effect of relational integration on recognition memory. Jones LL; Estes Z; Marsh RL Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1169-76. PubMed ID: 18938761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy. Schmidtke D; Kuperman V; Gagné CL; Spalding TL Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):556-70. PubMed ID: 26340846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Specialization and semantic organization: evidence for multiple semantics linked to sensory modalities. Marques JF Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16686106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conceptual information on objects' locations. Borghi AM; Caramelli N; Setti A Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 15781302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The picture superiority effect in conceptual implicit memory: a conceptual distinctiveness hypothesis. Hamilton M; Geraci L Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 16550852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modality switching costs emerge in concept creation as well as retrieval. Connell L; Lynott D Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):763-78. PubMed ID: 21564270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strengthening the case for stimulus-specificity in artificial grammar learning: no evidence for abstract representations with extended exposure. Johansson T Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):188-97. PubMed ID: 19289361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]