148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12507047)
1. Effect of background motion on line bisection performance in normal subjects.
Na DL; Son Y; Kim CH; Lee BH; Shon YM; Lee KJ; Lee KM; Adair JC; Watson RT; Heilman KM
Cortex; 2002 Dec; 38(5):787-96. PubMed ID: 12507047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determining priority between attentional and referential-coding sources of the Simon effect through optokinetic stimulation.
Figliozzi F; Silvetti M; Rubichi S; Doricchi F
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):1011-5. PubMed ID: 19961865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of illusory motion on line bisection performance in normal subjects.
Choi KM; Ku BD; Jeong Y; Lee BH; Ahn HJ; Kang SJ; Chin J; Heilman KM; Na DL
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2005 Nov; 11(7):881-8. PubMed ID: 16519267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of moving background on line bisection performance in the normal elderly versus patients with hemispatial neglect.
Choi KM; Lee BH; Lee SC; Ku BD; Kim EJ; Suh MK; Jeong Y; Heilman KM; Na DL
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 86(7):515-26. PubMed ID: 17581286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of optokinetically induced rotatory self-motion on spatial perception and representation.
Sándor PS; Bächtold D; Henn V; Brugger P
Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol; 2000 Jul; 13(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 10910090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of contextual stimuli on line bisection.
Chieffi S; Ricci M
Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):868-74. PubMed ID: 12509186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity.
Smeets JB; Brenner E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Feb; 21(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 7707030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induced motion: isolation and dissociation of egocentric and vection-entrained components.
Heckmann T; Howard IP
Perception; 1991; 20(3):285-305. PubMed ID: 1762872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visuospatial neglect in normal subjects: altered spatial representations induced by a perceptual illusion.
Fleming J; Behrmann M
Neuropsychologia; 1998 May; 36(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 9699953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The modulation of haptic line bisection by a visual illusion and optokinetic stimulation.
Gallace A; Auvray M; Spence C
Perception; 2007; 36(7):1003-18. PubMed ID: 17844966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvement of hemispatial neglect by a see-through head-mounted display: a preliminary study.
Kim JH; Lee BH; Go SM; Seo SW; Heilman KM; Na DL
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Dec; 12():114. PubMed ID: 26666223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contributions of the left and right cerebral hemispheres to line bisection.
Mennemeier M; Vezey E; Chatterjee A; Rapcsak SZ; Heilman KM
Neuropsychologia; 1997 May; 35(5):703-15. PubMed ID: 9153033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of center of mass effect on the distribution of spatial attention in the vertical and horizontal dimensions.
Shuren JE; Jacobs DH; Heilman KM
Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 9220092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Context effects in pseudo-neglect measured with a free vision Landmark task.
Rueckert L; McFadden HG
Laterality; 2004 Oct; 9(4):421-32. PubMed ID: 15513239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induced motion and the visual vertical: effects of frame size.
Brooks JN; Sherrick MF
Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Dec; 79(3 Pt 2):1443-50. PubMed ID: 7870529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection.
McCourt ME
Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(10):1065-76. PubMed ID: 11440759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The neglected page.
Shuren J; Wertman E; Heilman KM
Cortex; 1994 Mar; 30(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 8004987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Less attention and more perception in cued line bisection.
Fischer MH
Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 8043264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induced motion of a fixated target: influence of voluntary eye deviation.
Heckmann T; Post RB; Deering L
Percept Psychophys; 1991 Sep; 50(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 1754364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The tactual horizontal-vertical illusion depends on radial motion of the entire arm.
Heller MA; Calcaterra JA; Burson LL; Green SL
Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1297-311. PubMed ID: 9401462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
