BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12507245)

  • 1. Endosseous implants in horizontal alveolar ridge distraction osteogenesis.
    Nosaka Y; Kitano S; Wada K; Komori T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):846-53. PubMed ID: 12507245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Horizontal alveolar ridge distraction osteogenesis in dogs: radiographic and histologic studies.
    Nosaka Y; Kobayashi M; Kitano S; Komori T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(6):837-42. PubMed ID: 16392339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone response to functioning implants in dog mandibular alveolar ridges augmented with distraction osteogenesis.
    Block MS; Almerico B; Crawford C; Gardiner D; Chang A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):342-51. PubMed ID: 9638004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: comparison with a bone-splitting method in a dog model.
    Funaki K; Takahashi T; Yamuchi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):350-8. PubMed ID: 19121955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histomorphometric analysis of delayed implantation after horizontal distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in dogs.
    Sun JR; Kim SG; Moon SY; Lim SC; Ong JL
    Implant Dent; 2009 Oct; 18(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 22129959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of horizontal alveolar distraction osteogenesis for implant placement in a narrow alveolar ridge: a case report.
    Takahashi T; Funaki K; Shintani H; Haruoka T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):291-4. PubMed ID: 15101603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary study of the use of an internal, self-activated shape memory alloy distraction device in the dog mandible: alveolar ridge distraction and implant placement.
    Xie M; Hu M; Liu H; Xiao H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):2033-9. PubMed ID: 21316135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis using a simple device that permits secondary implant placement.
    Oda T; Sawaki Y; Ueda M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 10697943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis using titanium implants: an experimental study.
    Oda T; Sawaki Y; Ueda M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Apr; 28(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 10102400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay grafting. Part I: outcome of implant integration.
    Perry M; Hodges N; Hallmon DW; Rees T; Opperman LA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 16274142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Horizontal alveolar distraction of the mandibular canine regions for implant placement.
    Bulut E; Muglali M; Celebi N; Bekcioglu B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):830-2. PubMed ID: 20485062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Placement of implants in distraction osteogenesis: a pilot study in dogs.
    Nosaka Y; Tsunokuma M; Hayashi H; Kakudo K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 10795450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anteroinferior distraction of the atrophic subtotal maxillary alveolus for implant placement: a case report.
    Horiuchi K; Uchida H; Yamamoto K; Hatano N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 12074459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous ridges following alveolar distraction osteogenesis: clinical report of three cases.
    Ergun G; Nagas IC; Yilmaz D; Ozturk M
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():183-91. PubMed ID: 20662665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis.
    Rachmiel A; Srouji S; Peled M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 30(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 11829233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant rehabilitation following fibular reconstruction: a case series.
    Cheung LK; Chua HD; Hariri F; Pow EH; Zheng L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):255-71. PubMed ID: 23351759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interfaces of titanium implants and a vascularized osteocutaneous scapular graft revised with distraction osteogenesis.
    Hibi H; Ueda M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1549-50. PubMed ID: 22976657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant placement for periosteal expansion osteogenesis using beta-tricalcium phosphate block: an experimental study in dogs.
    Yamauchi K; Takahashi T; Funaki K; Miyamoto I; Yamashita Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 19766024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertical Osseodistraction with a New Intraosseous Alveolar Distractor Prototype for Dental Implant Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study in Dogs.
    Esposito M; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Vila CN; Peñarrocha M; García A; Sánchez A; Muñoz-Guzón F; Martínez Martín JM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):838-848. PubMed ID: 28708917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alveolar ridge augmentation with rhBMP-2 and bone-to-implant contact in induced bone.
    Sigurdsson TJ; Nguyen S; Wikesjo UM
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Oct; 21(5):461-73. PubMed ID: 11693239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.