180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12508174)
81. Evaluation of cell blocks from effusion specimens in Gynecologic Oncopathology: An experience of 220 cases, diagnosed at a Tertiary Cancer Referral Center.
Rekhi B; Karmarkar S; Gupta C; Deodhar KK; Menon S; Pathuthara S; Maheshwari A; Shylasree TS; Gupta S
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020; 63(3):427-434. PubMed ID: 32769333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Diagnostic pitfalls of peritoneal washing cytology and the role of cell blocks in their diagnosis.
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jun; 28(6):335-41. PubMed ID: 12768641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Ancillary p16(INK4a) adds no meaningful value to the performance of ER/PR/Vim/CEA panel in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
Yao CC; Kok LF; Lee MY; Wang PH; Wu TS; Tyan YS; Cheng YW; Kung MF; Han CP
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 19153755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Quantitative analysis of integrin expression in effusions using flow cytometric immunophenotyping.
Sigstad E; Dong HP; Nielsen S; Berner A; Davidson B; Risberg B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Nov; 33(5):325-31. PubMed ID: 16240402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Comparison of two polymer-based immunohistochemical detection systems: ENVISION+ and ImmPRESS.
Ramos-Vara JA; Miller MA
J Microsc; 2006 Nov; 224(Pt 2):135-9. PubMed ID: 17204059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. nm23 is expressed in reactive mesothelium and is not useful for detection of malignant cells in serous effusions.
Zimmerman RL; Fogt F
Oncol Rep; 2006 Jan; 15(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 16328038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. C4d immunohistochemical stain is a sensitive method to confirm immunoreactant deposition in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue in bullous pemphigoid.
Chandler W; Zone J; Florell S
J Cutan Pathol; 2009 Jun; 36(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 19515044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Cytologic findings of marginal zone lymphoma.
Crapanzano JP; Lin O
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):301-9. PubMed ID: 14579297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Use of desmin immunohistochemistry to distinguish between mesothelial cells and carcinoma in serous fluid cell block preparations.
Gill SA; Meier PA; Kendall BS
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(6):976-80. PubMed ID: 11127755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Management of cytological material, pre-analytical procedures and bio-banking in effusion cytopathology.
Engels M; Michael C; Dobra K; Hjerpe A; Fassina A; Firat P
Cytopathology; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 30430668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Immunohistochemical distinction between mesothelial and adenocarcinoma cells in serous effusions: a combination panel-based approach with a brief review of the literature.
Murugan P; Siddaraju N; Habeebullah S; Basu D
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2009; 52(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 19332905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Evaluation of impact of immunocytochemical techniques in cytological diagnosis of neoplastic effusions.
Linari A; Bussolati G
J Clin Pathol; 1989 Nov; 42(11):1184-9. PubMed ID: 2685053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Immunocytochemistry and DNA-image cytometry in diagnostic effusion cytology. II. Diagnostic accuracy in equivocal smears.
Motherby H; Friedrichs N; Kube M; Nadjari B; Knops K; Donner A; Baschiera B; Dalquen P; Böcking A
Anal Cell Pathol; 1999; 19(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 10746435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Millipore filter cell block preparation: an alternative to cell block in nongynecologic specimens of limited cellularity.
Baloch ZW; Lee A; Cobbs C; Roberts S; LiVolsi VA; Gupta PK
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Jun; 20(6):389-92. PubMed ID: 10352916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Accuracy and added value of triage beyond segregating potentially neoplastic effusions in immediate wet preparation.
Arabi H; Yousef N; Han L; Bandyopadhyay S; Feng J; Al-Abbadi M
Acta Cytol; 2009; 53(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 19248556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Immunocytochemistry on the Thinprep processor.
Dabbs DJ; Abendroth CS; Grenko RT; Wang X; Radcliffe GE
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Nov; 17(5):388-92. PubMed ID: 9360054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Evaluation of histochemical methods for the detection of intracytoplasmic mucin in serous effusions.
Yu GH; De Frias DV; Horcher AM
Cytopathology; 1999 Oct; 10(5):298-302. PubMed ID: 10588347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Utility of the capsule-based technique for cell block preparation - in body fluids and Liqui-PREP™ specimens.
Wen CH; Tsao SC; Su YC; Wu CC; Chai CY
Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 21986175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Special stains, the old and the new: the impact of immunocytochemistry in effusion cytology.
Bedrossian CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Feb; 18(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 9484644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
100. Lymphoid-rich effusions. Diagnosis by morphometry using the CAS 200 System.
Walts AE; Svidler R; Tolmachoff T; Marchevsky AM
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):526-30. PubMed ID: 8160646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
