These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12508300)

  • 1. Effects of superimposed electrical stimulation on perceived discomfort and torque increment size and variability.
    Miller M; Downham D; Lexell J
    Muscle Nerve; 2003 Jan; 27(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 12508300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Superimposed single impulse and pulse train electrical stimulation: A quantitative assessment during submaximal isometric knee extension in young, healthy men.
    Miller M; Downham D; Lexell J
    Muscle Nerve; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1038-46. PubMed ID: 10417784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voluntary activation and central activation failure in the knee extensors in young women and men.
    Miller M; Holmbäck AM; Downham D; Lexell J
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2006 Aug; 16(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 16895533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of voluntary activation of the back muscles using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Lagan J; Lang P; Strutton PH
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2839-45. PubMed ID: 18976953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in quadriceps femoris muscle torque when using a clinical electrical stimulator versus a portable electrical stimulator.
    Lyons CL; Robb JB; Irrgang JJ; Fitzgerald GK
    Phys Ther; 2005 Jan; 85(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 15623361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Random motor unit activation by electrostimulation.
    Jubeau M; Gondin J; Martin A; Sartorio A; Maffiuletti NA
    Int J Sports Med; 2007 Nov; 28(11):901-4. PubMed ID: 17525881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of sustained low-intensity contractions on supraspinal fatigue in human elbow flexor muscles.
    Søgaard K; Gandevia SC; Todd G; Petersen NT; Taylor JL
    J Physiol; 2006 Jun; 573(Pt 2):511-23. PubMed ID: 16556656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of stimulation intensity on assessment of voluntary activation.
    Van Leeuwen DM; De Ruiter CJ; De Haan A
    Muscle Nerve; 2012 Jun; 45(6):841-8. PubMed ID: 22581538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of summation of contraction on acceleration signals in human skeletal muscle.
    Ohta Y; Shima N; Yabe K
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2010 Oct; 20(5):1007-13. PubMed ID: 20430645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Russian current and low-frequency pulsed current on discomfort level and current amplitude at 10% maximal knee extensor torque.
    Vaz MA; Aragão FA; Boschi ÉS; Fortuna R; Melo Mde O
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2012 Nov; 28(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22404697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of joint angle on the timing of muscle contractions elicited by neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
    Sinclair PJ; Smith RM; Davis GM
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2004 Jun; 12(2):303-6. PubMed ID: 15218944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between alternating and pulsed current electrical muscle stimulation for muscle and systemic acute responses.
    Aldayel A; Jubeau M; McGuigan M; Nosaka K
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2010 Sep; 109(3):735-44. PubMed ID: 20595542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of stimulus pulse width on M-waves, H-reflexes, and torque during tetanic low-intensity neuromuscular stimulation.
    Lagerquist O; Collins DF
    Muscle Nerve; 2010 Dec; 42(6):886-93. PubMed ID: 20886511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of stimulation frequency and pulse duration on fatigue and metabolic cost during a single bout of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
    Gondin J; Giannesini B; Vilmen C; Dalmasso C; le Fur Y; Cozzone PJ; Bendahan D
    Muscle Nerve; 2010 May; 41(5):667-78. PubMed ID: 20082417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Superimposed electrical stimulation: assessment of voluntary activation and perceived discomfort in healthy, moderately active older and younger women and men.
    Miller M; Flansbjer UB; Downham D; Lexell J
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 85(12):945-50. PubMed ID: 17116999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Turning on the central contribution to contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
    Dean JC; Yates LM; Collins DF
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2007 Jul; 103(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 17463296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative torque contribution of vastus medialis muscle at different knee angles.
    de Ruiter CJ; Hoddenbach JG; Huurnink A; de Haan A
    Acta Physiol (Oxf); 2008 Nov; 194(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 18691348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Interference versus low frequency. A comparison of 2 methods of electric muscle stimulation].
    Gubler B; Hildebrandt M
    Schweiz Z Sportmed; 1993 Mar; 41(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 8469945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variable frequency trains enhance torque independent of stimulation amplitude.
    Slade JM; Bickel CS; Warren GL; Dudley GA
    Acta Physiol Scand; 2003 Jan; 177(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 12492782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting optimal electrical stimulation for repetitive human muscle activation.
    Chou LW; Ding J; Wexler AS; Binder-Macleod SA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Jun; 15(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 15763677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.