206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12508334)
1. The Japanese version of the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist-Revised: development and validation.
Yasuda T; Lubin B; Kim J; Van Whitlock R
J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jan; 59(1):93-109. PubMed ID: 12508334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of affective temperaments in Hungary: internal consistency and concurrent validity of the TEMPS-A against the TCI and NEO-PI-R.
Rózsa S; Rihmer Z; Gonda X; Szili I; Rihmer A; Ko N; Németh A; Pestality P; Bagdy G; Alhassoon O; Akiskal KK; Akiskal HS
J Affect Disord; 2008 Feb; 106(1-2):45-53. PubMed ID: 17706791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Validation of the German version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in normal persons and psychiatric patients].
Bach M; Bach D; de Zwaan M; Serim M; Böhmer F
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 1996 Jan; 46(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 8850096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A grade four reading level key for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised.
Lubin B; Van Whitlock R
Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Feb; 86(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 9530719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The new MAACL scales with adolescents: preliminary reliability and validity determinations.
Nickel EJ; Lubin B; Rinck CM
Adolescence; 1986; 21(81):81-6. PubMed ID: 3728143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychometric properties of the grade 4 reading level Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised with offenders.
Van Whitlock R; Lubin B
Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Apr; 86(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 9638753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjective checklist to assess the big five personality factors in the Argentine population.
Ledesma RD; Sánchez R; Díaz-Lázaro CM
J Pers Assess; 2011 Jan; 93(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 21184330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Japanese version of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a large community sample.
Yoshimura K; Ono Y; Nakamura K; Nathan JH; Suzuki K
Psychol Rep; 2001 Apr; 88(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 11351886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the short and long forms of the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised (MAACL-R).
Lubin B; Van Whitlock R; Reddy D; Petren S
J Clin Psychol; 2001 Mar; 57(3):411-6. PubMed ID: 11241371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Translation and validation of the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS Social Anhedonia Scale, M.L. Eckblad, L.J. Chapman et al., 1982). Study of the internal and concurrent validity in 126 normal subjects].
Kosmadakis CS; Bungener C; Pierson A; Jouvent R; Widlöcher D
Encephale; 1995; 21(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 8674468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discriminant and convergent validity of self-report measures of affective distress in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Hagglund KJ; Roth DL; Haley WE; Alarcón GS
J Rheumatol; 1989 Nov; 16(11):1428-32. PubMed ID: 2600941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Validation of the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) in a French-speaking environment].
Favrod J; Ernst F; Giuliani F; Bonsack C
Encephale; 2009 Jun; 35(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 19540410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: construct validity of the BFNE-II.
Carleton RN; Collimore KC; Asmundson GJ
J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 16675196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factorial structure and internal consistency of the German TEMPS-A scale: validation against the NEO-FFI questionnaire.
Blöink R; Brieger P; Akiskal HS; Marneros A
J Affect Disord; 2005 Mar; 85(1-2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15780678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A grade-six reading level key for the multiple affect adjective check list-revised.
Lubin B; Van Whitlock R; Rea MR
Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):883-9. PubMed ID: 8668447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Construction of validity scales for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised.
Van Whitlock R; Lubin B
Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Feb; 86(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 9530716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Japanese version of Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory and its psychometric assessment.
Kikuchi A; Wada K
Nihon Arukoru Yakubutsu Igakkai Zasshi; 2000 Dec; 35(6):388-401. PubMed ID: 11197873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scrupulosity and obsessive-compulsive symptoms: confirmatory factor analysis and validity of the Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity.
Olatunji BO; Abramowitz JS; Williams NL; Connolly KM; Lohr JM
J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(6):771-87. PubMed ID: 17250990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factor structure, concurrent validity, and internal consistency of the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition in a sample of college students.
Storch EA; Roberti JW; Roth DA
Depress Anxiety; 2004; 19(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 15129421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychometric properties of the State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA): comparison to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
Grös DF; Antony MM; Simms LJ; McCabe RE
Psychol Assess; 2007 Dec; 19(4):369-81. PubMed ID: 18085930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
