170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12508700)
1. Expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome: its impact on jurors' decisions.
Schuller RA; Rzepa S
Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):655-73. PubMed ID: 12508700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Expert evidence pertaining to battered women: the impact of gender of expert and timing of testimony.
Schuller RA; Cripps J
Law Hum Behav; 1998 Feb; 22(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 9487789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Battered women who kill: the impact of expert testimony and empathy induction in the courtroom.
Plumm KM; Terrance CA
Violence Against Women; 2009 Feb; 15(2):186-205. PubMed ID: 19126834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.
Devenport JL; Cutler BL
Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 15638210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill.
Terrance CA; Matheson K; Spanos NP
Law Hum Behav; 2000 Apr; 24(2):207-29. PubMed ID: 10810839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Secondary confessions: the influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors' perceptions of informant testimony.
Maeder EM; Pica E
Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):560-8. PubMed ID: 25180762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?
Brodsky SL; Neal TM; Cramer RJ; Ziemke MH
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 20019000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving juror assessments of forensic testimony and its effects on decision-making and evidence evaluation.
LaBat DE; Goldfarb D; Evans JR; Compo NS; Koolmees CJ; LaPorte G; Lothridge K
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Oct; 47(5):566-578. PubMed ID: 37603005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expert testimony influences juror decisions in criminal trials involving recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.
Khurshid A; Jacquin KM
J Child Sex Abus; 2013; 22(8):949-67. PubMed ID: 24283545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Battered women syndrome as a tort cause of action.
Tonsing H
J Law Health; 1997-1998; 12(2):407-49. PubMed ID: 10539299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?
Henderson KS; Levett LM
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):638-649. PubMed ID: 27243361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Battered woman syndrome defense in Canadian courts.
Regehr C; Glancy G
Can J Psychiatry; 1995 Apr; 40(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 7606702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM; Seib HM
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 15161410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An increasingly problematic situation in Georgia regarding difficulty in rebutting defense testimony on battered person syndrome (BPS).
Elliott RL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(2):302-3. PubMed ID: 22635303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual versus group decision making: Jurors' reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony.
Salerno JM; Bottoms BL; Peter-Hagene LC
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0183580. PubMed ID: 28931011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Expert testimony regarding child witnesses: does it sensitize jurors to forensic interview quality?
Buck JA; London K; Wright DB
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 20443056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thin slice expert testimony and mock trial deliberations.
Parrott CT; Brodsky SL; Wilson JK
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():67-74. PubMed ID: 26346686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
