261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12509023)
21. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Perceptual Detection of Subtle Dysphonic Traits in Individuals with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Using an Audience Response Systems Approach.
Johansson K; Strömbergsson S; Robieux C; McAllister A
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):126.e7-126.e17. PubMed ID: 26850470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Listener experience and perception of voice quality.
Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Precoda K
J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 2314068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.
Ehrlich B; Lin L; Jiang J
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 30304342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Effect of Visual Sort and Rate Versus Visual Analog Scales on the Reliability of Judgments of Dysphonia.
Kapsner-Smith MR; Opuszynski A; Stepp CE; Eadie TL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 May; 64(5):1571-1580. PubMed ID: 33909472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The cut-off analysis using visual analogue scale and cepstral assessments on severity of voice disorder.
Lee YW; Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Dec; 43(4):175-180. PubMed ID: 29671679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
Wolfe VI; Martin DP; Palmer CI
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 10877439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Impact of Dysphonic Voices on Healthy Listeners: Listener Reaction Times, Speech Intelligibility, and Listener Comprehension.
Evitts PM; Starmer H; Teets K; Montgomery C; Calhoun L; Schulze A; MacKenzie J; Adams L
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Nov; 25(4):561-575. PubMed ID: 27784031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Scaling voice activity limitation and participation restriction in dysphonic individuals.
Ma EP; Yiu EM
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 17337897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of Dysphonia and Cognitive-Perceptual Listener Strategies on Speech Intelligibility.
Porcaro CK; Evitts PM; King N; Hood C; Campbell E; White L; Veraguas J
J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):806.e7-806.e18. PubMed ID: 31031103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Effect of Anchors and Training on the Reliability of Voice Quality Ratings for Different Types of Speech Stimuli.
Brinca L; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Pinto PN; Araújo L
J Voice; 2015 Nov; 29(6):776.e7-14. PubMed ID: 25795348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Perceptual Judgment of Voice Quality in Nondysphonic French Speakers: Effect of Task-, Speaker- and Listener-Related Variables.
Delvaux V; Pillot-Loiseau C
J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):682-693. PubMed ID: 30922738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
Jannetts S; Lowit A
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does the presence or location of graphic markers affect untrained listeners' ratings of severity of dysphonia?
Nagle KF; Helou LB; Solomon NP; Eadie TL
J Voice; 2014 Jul; 28(4):469-75. PubMed ID: 24629645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An Examination of Pre- and Posttreatment Acoustic Versus Auditory Perceptual Analyses of Voice Across Four Common Voice Disorders.
Gillespie AI; Gartner-Schmidt J; Lewandowski A; Awan SN
J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):169-176. PubMed ID: 28688672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Acoustic and perceptual analysis of modal and falsetto registers in females with dysphonia.
Li NY; Yiu EM
Clin Linguist Phon; 2006 Aug; 20(6):463-81. PubMed ID: 16815791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
