BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12509023)

  • 41. Acoustic and perceptual analysis of modal and falsetto registers in females with dysphonia.
    Li NY; Yiu EM
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006 Aug; 20(6):463-81. PubMed ID: 16815791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
    Lu FL; Matteson S
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Perceptions of audible nasal emission in speakers with cleft palate: a comparative study of listener judgments.
    Baylis AL; Munson B; Moller KT
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):399-411. PubMed ID: 20572776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of different voice samples for perceptual analysis.
    Revis J; Giovanni A; Wuyts F; Triglia J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1999; 51(3):108-16. PubMed ID: 10394058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Relationship of spectral noise levels to psychophysical scaling of vowel roughness.
    Toner MA; Emanuel FW; Parker D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 2359264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Top-down mechanisms in dysphonia perception: the need for blind tests.
    Ghio A; Révis J; Merienne S; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 23809570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality of Cochlear-implanted and Normal-hearing Individuals: A Reliability Study.
    Coelho AC; Brasolotto AG; Fernandes ACN; de Souza Medved DM; da Silva EM; Júnior FB
    J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):774.e1-774.e8. PubMed ID: 28318969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Equal appearing interval and visual analogue scaling of perceptual roughness and breathiness.
    Yiu EM; Ng CY
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2004; 18(3):211-29. PubMed ID: 15151192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity.
    Ma EP; Yiu EM
    J Voice; 2006 Sep; 20(3):380-90. PubMed ID: 16185841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Children's Subjective Ratings and Opinions of Typical and Dysphonic Voice After Performing a Language Comprehension Task in Background Noise.
    Brännström KJ; Holm L; Lyberg-Åhlander V; Haake M; Kastberg T; Sahlén B
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):624-30. PubMed ID: 25873548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Influence of Voice Sample Length in the Auditory-Perceptual Judgment of Overall Voice Quality.
    Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):202-210. PubMed ID: 27539001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Objective and subjective assessment of tracheoesophageal prosthesis voice outcome.
    D'Alatri L; Bussu F; Scarano E; Paludetti G; Marchese MR
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):607-13. PubMed ID: 22209062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: a comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers.
    Brinca LF; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Gonçalves IC; Moreno ML
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24491499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A Measure of the Auditory-perceptual Quality of Strain from Electroglottographic Analysis of Continuous Dysphonic Speech: Application to Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia.
    Somanath K; Mau T
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):770.e9-770.e21. PubMed ID: 26739857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
    Özcebe E; Aydinli FE; Tiğrak TK; İncebay Ö; Yilmaz T
    J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):382.e1-382.e10. PubMed ID: 29331405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An acoustic-perceptual study of vocal tremor.
    Anand S; Shrivastav R; Wingate JM; Chheda NN
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):811.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22921293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Voice in Friedreich Ataxia.
    Vogel AP; Wardrop MI; Folker JE; Synofzik M; Corben LA; Delatycki MB; Awan SN
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):243.e9-243.e19. PubMed ID: 27501923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparison of equal-appearing interval scaling and direct magnitude estimation of nasal voice quality.
    Zraick RI; Liss JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):979-88. PubMed ID: 11386483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders.
    Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; de Souza GS; Hachiya A; Tsuji DH
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):765.e7-765.e11. PubMed ID: 26627119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.