These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12509023)

  • 61. Listeners' attitude toward people with dysphonia.
    Amir O; Levine-Yundof R
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):524.e1-10. PubMed ID: 23490129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
    Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Influence of Phonatory Break Duration and Pause Time on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Speech Acceptability and Listener Comfort in Adductor-Type Laryngeal Dystonia.
    Doyle PC; Woldmo R; Nagle KF; Crews N; Jovanovic N
    J Voice; 2024 Jul; 38(4):965.e15-965.e24. PubMed ID: 34887140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].
    Ptok M; Schwemmle C; Iven C; Jessen M; Nawka T
    HNO; 2006 Oct; 54(10):793-802. PubMed ID: 16132879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Perception of vocal tremor during sustained phonation compared with sentence context.
    Lederle A; Barkmeier-Kraemer J; Finnegan E
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):668.e1-9. PubMed ID: 22521323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings.
    Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The Relationship Between the Aerodynamic Parameters of Voice and Perceptual Evaluation in the Iranian Population With or Without Voice Disorders.
    Aghajanzadeh M; Darouie A; Dabirmoghaddam P; Salehi A; Rahgozar M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):250.e9-250.e15. PubMed ID: 27542776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Auditory-perceptual Assessment of Healthy and Disordered Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.
    Contreras-Ruston F; Guzman M; Castillo-Allendes A; Cantor-Cutiva L; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):654-659. PubMed ID: 34903393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC; Hansen K; Beaudin PG
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 17055223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The relationship between perception of vocal effort and relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset.
    Stepp CE; Sawin DE; Eadie TL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1887-96. PubMed ID: 22615477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Development and perceptual assessment of a synthesizer of disordered voices.
    Fraj S; Schoentgen J; Grenez F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2603-15. PubMed ID: 23039453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Is perceived dysphonia related to perceived healthiness?
    Maryn Y; Debo K
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Oct; 40(3):122-8. PubMed ID: 24850269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Agreement between Transcription- and Rating-Based Intelligibility Measurements for Evaluation of Dysphonic Speech in Noise.
    Ishikawa K; Webster J; Ketring C
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2021 Oct; 35(10):983-995. PubMed ID: 33251880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Acoustic measures of dysphonic severity across and within voice types.
    Wolfe V; Fitch J; Martin D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(6):292-9. PubMed ID: 9415734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Correlation of instrumental voice evaluation with perceptual voice analysis using a modified visual analog scale.
    Yu P; Revis J; Wuyts FL; Zanaret M; Giovanni A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(6):271-81. PubMed ID: 12417797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.