These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12509164)

  • 1. Do landmarks help or hinder women in route learning?
    Gwinn HM; Fernando S; James S; Wilson JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):713-8. PubMed ID: 12509164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Landmarks in route learning by girls and boys.
    Beilstein CD; Wilson JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):877-82. PubMed ID: 11153864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex differences in landmark learning by children aged 5 to 12 years.
    Kersker JL; Epley ML; Wilson JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):329-38. PubMed ID: 12705541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex differences in route learning by children.
    Gibbs AC; Wilson JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Apr; 88(2):590-4. PubMed ID: 10483650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender differences in landmark learning for virtual navigation: the role of distance to a goal.
    Chamizo VD; Artigas AA; Sansa J; Banterla F
    Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21736927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How useful are landmarks when learning a route in a virtual environment? Evidence from typical development and Williams syndrome.
    Farran EK; Courbois Y; Van Herwegen J; Blades M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Apr; 111(4):571-86. PubMed ID: 22244218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Landmark stability: further studies pointing to a role in spatial learning.
    Biegler R; Morris RG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1996 Nov; 49(4):307-45. PubMed ID: 8962538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Salience and asymmetric judgments of physical distance.
    Formanowicz M; Karylowski JJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Feb; 112(1):289-94. PubMed ID: 21466102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Landmark enhancement and strategic processing: an evaluation of strategies for spatial navigation training.
    Guest M; Bliss J; Lohmeier J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Dec; 85(3 Pt 1):1123-35. PubMed ID: 9399329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex differences on the judgment of line orientation task: a function of landmark presence and hormonal status.
    Goyette SR; McCoy JG; Kennedy A; Sullivan M
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Feb; 105(4):1045-51. PubMed ID: 22154804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex differences in a landmark environmental re-orientation task only during the learning phase.
    Piccardi L; Bianchini F; Iasevoli L; Giannone G; Guariglia C
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Oct; 503(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 21889578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning of absolute and relative distance and direction from discrete visual landmarks by pigeons (Columba livia).
    Sturz BR; Katz JS
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Feb; 123(1):90-113. PubMed ID: 19236148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye tracking, strategies, and sex differences in virtual navigation.
    Andersen NE; Dahmani L; Konishi K; Bohbot VD
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2012 Jan; 97(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 22001012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Global and local spatial landmarks: their role during foraging by Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus).
    Vlasak AN
    Anim Cogn; 2006 Jan; 9(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16163480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning.
    Presson CC; Hazelrigg MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Oct; 10(4):716-22. PubMed ID: 6239007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-dependent use of local and global landmarks during escape: experiments using Columbian ground squirrels.
    Nesterova AP
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jul; 75(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 17462833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial relational learning and memory abilities do not differ between men and women in a real-world, open-field environment.
    Banta Lavenex P; Lavenex P
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 19800920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flexible learning and use of multiple-landmark information by pigeons (Columba livia) in a touch screen-based goal searching task.
    Ushitani T; Jitsumori M
    J Comp Psychol; 2011 Aug; 125(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 21574692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Close women, distant men: line bisection reveals sex-dimorphic patterns of visuomotor performance in near and far space.
    Stancey H; Turner M
    Br J Psychol; 2010 May; 101(Pt 2):293-309. PubMed ID: 19646327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Symmetry and asymmetry of human spatial memory.
    McNamara TP; Diwadkar VA
    Cogn Psychol; 1997 Nov; 34(2):160-90. PubMed ID: 9398395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.