223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12509358)
1. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study.
Ammenwerth E; Mansmann U; Iller C; Eichstädter R
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 12509358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic evaluation of computer-based nursing documentation.
Ammenwerth E; Kutscha A; Eichstädter R; Haux R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1102-6. PubMed ID: 11604899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized evaluation of a computer-based nursing documentation system.
Ammenwerth E; Eichstädter R; Haux R; Pohl U; Rebel S; Ziegler S
Methods Inf Med; 2001 May; 40(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 11424305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effects of a computer-assisted system for nursing care documentation on quality and quantity of nursing care documentation].
Mahler C; Ammenwerth E; Tautz A; Wagner A; Eichstädter R; Hoppe B
Pflege; 2003 Jun; 16(3):144-52. PubMed ID: 12838723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are quantitative methods sufficient to show why wards react differently to computer-based nursing documentation?
Ammenwerth E; Mansmann U; Mahler C; Kandert M; Eichstädter R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 90():377-81. PubMed ID: 15460721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nursing process documentation systems in clinical routine--prerequisites and experiences.
Ammenwerth E; Kutscha U; Kutscha A; Mahler C; Eichstädter R; Haux R
Int J Med Inform; 2001 Dec; 64(2-3):187-200. PubMed ID: 11734385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation.
Smith K; Smith V; Krugman M; Oman K
Comput Inform Nurs; 2005; 23(3):132-8. PubMed ID: 15900170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying barriers for implementation of computer based nursing documentation.
Vollmer AM; Prokosch HU; Bürkle T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 201():94-101. PubMed ID: 24943530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nurses' experiences of and opinions about using standardised care plans in electronic health records--a questionnaire study.
Dahm MF; Wadensten B
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2137-45. PubMed ID: 18705735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Designing an EMR planning process based on staff attitudes toward and opinions about computers in healthcare.
McLane S
Comput Inform Nurs; 2005; 23(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 15772509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of a computer-based nursing documentation system on the quality of nursing documentation.
Mahler C; Ammenwerth E; Wagner A; Tautz A; Happek T; Hoppe B; Eichstädter R
J Med Syst; 2007 Aug; 31(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 17685151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses' perceptions, attitudes, and preferences.
Moody LE; Slocumb E; Berg B; Jackson D
Comput Inform Nurs; 2004; 22(6):337-44. PubMed ID: 15602303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. User acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system.
Quinzio L; Junger A; Gottwald B; Benson M; Hartmann B; Jost A; Banzhaf A; Hempelmann G
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Dec; 20(12):967-72. PubMed ID: 14690099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploration of nurses' information environment.
Ballard EC
Nurse Res; 2006; 13(4):50-65. PubMed ID: 16897940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electronic documentation on a psychiatric unit.
Tiessen B; Doan K; Benoit L
Can Nurse; 2001 Nov; 97(10):27-9. PubMed ID: 11765435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving information management in ward nurses' practice.
Ballard EC
Nurs Stand; 2006 Aug 23-29; 20(50):43-8. PubMed ID: 16964775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Barriers and facilitators to electronic documentation in a rural hospital.
Whittaker AA; Aufdenkamp M; Tinley S
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2009; 41(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 19723278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nursing process documentation--effects on workload and quality when using a computer program and a key word model for nursing documentation.
Sahlstedt S; Adolfsson H; Ehnfors M; Källström B
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 46():330-6. PubMed ID: 10175419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring the user acceptance of a Web-based nursing documentation system.
Liaskos J; Mantas J
Methods Inf Med; 2006; 45(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 16482381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Point of care technology: impact on people and paperwork.
Dennis KE; Sweeney PM; Macdonald LP; Morse NA
Nurs Econ; 1993; 11(4):229-37, 248. PubMed ID: 8232641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
