These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1250980)

  • 1. Comparison of the image quality of 105mm film with conventional film.
    Skucas J; Gorski JW
    Radiology; 1976 Feb; 118(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 1250980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The application of fast screen-film systems to excretory urography.
    Stables DP; Rossi RP; Caruthers SB; Anderson N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Apr; 128(4):617-9. PubMed ID: 403791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative image quality of 105 mm and conventional spot films.
    Weaver KE; Trembley CA; Lewicki AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):615-8. PubMed ID: 6607654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-image camera for spot radiography at fluoroscopic examinations.
    Hynes DM; Edmonds EW; Krametz KR; Baranoski D; Hughes T
    Radiology; 1980 Jul; 136(1):213-8. PubMed ID: 7384502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of crossover exposure on radiographic image quality of screen-film systems.
    Doi K; Loo LN; Anderson TM; Frank PH
    Radiology; 1981 Jun; 139(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 7232738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective performance measurements versus perceived image quality in intensified fluoroscopic or photospot images.
    Gould RG; Belanger B; Goldberg HI; Moss A
    Radiology; 1980 Dec; 137(3):783-8. PubMed ID: 7444062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Picture quality and film mammography. I. The physical parameters of the filming system (gradation, sensitivity, definition and granularity) and the effect of exposure geometry (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M; Weskamp P
    Rofo; 1976 Sep; 125(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 134958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scanography with rotation of the radiographic tube: a new method.
    Korbuly D; Moore R; Formanek A; Castaneda-Zuniga W; Justich E; Amplatz K
    Radiology; 1980 May; 135(2):495-9. PubMed ID: 7367646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Extrafocal radiation of medical x-ray tubes with a rotating anode].
    Juran R; Hinz R
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 2343094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of CRT images of digitized film angiographs].
    Mashita S; Ishigaki T; Ikeda M; Sakuma S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 49(8):1025-37. PubMed ID: 2594482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of new film high-light system by comparison with conventional film.
    Gray JE; Capp MP; Freundlich IM
    Radiol Technol; 1975; 47(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 1144735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quality control in computed tomography].
    Rockstroh G; Lieberenz S; Straubel U
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1989; 30(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 2798824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical applications of basic x-ray physics principles.
    Schueler BA
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):731-44; quiz 729. PubMed ID: 9599394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal magnification in radiologic images of thick objects: a new concept in magnification radiography.
    Doi K; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1975 Feb; 114(2):443-7. PubMed ID: 1111013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adverse effects of increased body weight on quantitative measures of mammographic image quality.
    Guest AR; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Bailey JE; Roubidoux MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):805-10. PubMed ID: 10954471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)].
    Weberling R
    Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evaluation of high-speed screen-film combinations in angiography.
    Ovitt TW; Moore R; Armplatz K
    Radiology; 1975 Feb; 114(2):449-52. PubMed ID: 1111014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of screen/film combinations on diagnostic certainty: Hi-Plus/RPL versus Lanex/Ortho G in excretory urography.
    Thornbury JR; Fryback DG; Patterson FE; Chiavarini RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jan; 130(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 413423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospects for x-ray exposure reduction using rare earth intensifying screens.
    Wagner RF; Weaver KE
    Radiology; 1976 Jan; 118(1):183-8. PubMed ID: 1244656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improvement of image quality using BLADE sequences in brain MR imaging.
    Lavdas E; Mavroidis P; Kostopoulos S; Glotsos D; Roka V; Topalzikis T; Bakas A; Oikonomou G; Papanikolaou N; Batsikas G; Kaffes I; Kechagias D
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Feb; 31(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 22959874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.