These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1251024)

  • 21. Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets.
    Sechopoulosa I; D'Orsi CJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 9(4):161-171. PubMed ID: 19020492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose.
    Uhlenbrock DF; Mertelmeier T
    Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dependence of scatter on atomic number for x rays from tungsten and molybdenum anodes in the mammographic energy range.
    Aus RJ; DeWerd LA; Pearson DW; Micka JA; Ng KH
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 10435532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
    Thilander-Klang AC; Ackerholm PH; Berlin IC; Bjurstam NG; Mattsson SL; Månsson LG; von Schéele C; Thunberg SJ
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Niobium/molybdenum K-edge filtration in mammography: contrast and dose evaluation.
    Calicchia A; Gambaccini M; Indovina PL; Mazzei F; Pugliani L
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Sep; 41(9):1717-26. PubMed ID: 8884908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Calculated mammographic spectra confirmed with attenuation curves for molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten targets.
    Blough MM; Waggener RG; Payne WH; Terry JA
    Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1605-12. PubMed ID: 9775364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast composition and radiographic breast equivalence.
    McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar; 20(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9141308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of mammographic screen-film systems.
    Arnold BA; Webster EW; Kalisher L
    Radiology; 1978 Oct; 129(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 693873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of anode and filter material on image quality and glandular dose for screen-film mammography.
    Desponds L; Depeursinge C; Grecescu M; Hessler C; Samiri A; Valley JF
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Sep; 36(9):1165-82. PubMed ID: 1946601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Absorbed dose in mammography using three tungsten and three molybdenum target tubes.
    Palmer RC; Egan RL; Tanner BK; Barnette PA
    Radiology; 1971 Dec; 101(3):697-9. PubMed ID: 5129114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct analysis of molybdenum target generated x-ray spectra with a portable device.
    Stumbo S; Bottigli U; Golosio B; Oliva P; Tangaro S
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2763-70. PubMed ID: 15543781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative contrast-enhanced mammography for contrast medium kinetics studies.
    Arvanitis CD; Speller R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6041-64. PubMed ID: 19779213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.
    Wu X; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
    Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 2006265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
    Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
    Wu X; Gingold EL; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography: dependence on anode material, breast thickness, and lesion type.
    Fahrig R; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Sep; 21(9):1473-81. PubMed ID: 7838059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Progress in mammography technics. Bimetal anode tubes and selective filtration technic].
    Küchler M; Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8334265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of absorbed dose in mammography: monte carlo simulation studies.
    Doi K; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1980 Apr; 135(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 7360961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit.
    Hemdal B; Herrnsdorf L; Andersson I; Bengtsson G; Heddson B; Olsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.