279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12510251)
1. Reliability of different techniques to assess marginal defects of Class II restorations in retrieved primary molars: a visual-tactile, SEM, dye penetration and polarized light microscopy study.
Fuks AB; Araujo FB; Donly KJ; Cervantes M
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2002 Oct; 19(4):6-16, 67. PubMed ID: 12510251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars.
Fuks AB; Araujo FB; Osorio LB; Hadani PE; Pinto AS
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 11132507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations.
Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Wernecke KD; Roulet JF
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):401-10. PubMed ID: 11203848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations.
Wibowo G; Stockton L
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11572297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptation of Class II Vitremer restorations with and without primer: a morphometric study.
Gleicher H; Fuks AB; Sela J
Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(4):263-6. PubMed ID: 9783297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
Rodrigues Junior SA; Pin LF; Machado G; Della Bona A; Demarco FF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Penetration of radiocalcium at the margins of resin and glass ionomer dentine bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth.
Tulunoglu O; Tulunoglu I; Ulusu T; Genç Y
J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):481-6. PubMed ID: 10960751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Class II restorations with margins below the CEJ.
Kanca J; Greitzer G
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 19508264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of restorative techniques on marginal adaptation and dye penetration around Class V restorations.
Pereira Ade F; Poiate IA; Poiate E; Rodrigues FP; Turbino ML; Miranda WG
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):e17-21. PubMed ID: 22313988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
da Silva Telles PD; Aparecida M; Machado M; Nör JE
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
