These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12510251)

  • 21. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
    Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
    Fourie J; Smit CF
    SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of the cavity configuration factor on the marginal microleakage of esthetic restorative materials.
    Franco EB; Gonzaga Lopes L; Lia Mondelli RF; da Silva e Souza MH; Pereira Lauris JR
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 12967078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microleakage in class II composite resin restorations: total bonding and open sandwich technique.
    Loguercio AD; Alessandra R; Mazzocco KC; Dias AL; Busato AL; Singer Jda M; Rosa P
    J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 12236642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro evaluation of the marginal seal of four restoration materials on deciduous molars.
    Atash R; Bottenberg P; Petein M; Vanden Abbeele A
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2003; 45(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 14535057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques.
    Beznos C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 11203779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations.
    Erhardt MC; Magalhães CS; Serra MC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 12120778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The marginal seal of a flowable composite, an injectable resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer in primary molars--an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Madan M; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 14700335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique.
    Fabianelli A; Sgarra A; Goracci C; Cantoro A; Pollington S; Ferrari M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20533631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations.
    Amaral CM; Hara AT; Pimenta LA; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11806477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
    Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
    Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW; Harris EF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16536195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Marginal microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations: a combined in vivo and in vitro study.
    Di Lenarda R; Cadenaro M; Gregorig G; De Stefano Dorigo E
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 11317396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microleakage of Class 2 glass-ionomer-silver restorations in primary molars.
    Fuks AB; Holan G; Simon H; Lewinstein I
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 1437689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.