These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. X-ray generators. Seibert JA Radiographics; 1997; 17(6):1533-57. PubMed ID: 9397462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a test device to assess X-ray phototimers. Buchel GL; Sabau MN; Wilson TL; Sadler JJ Radiol Technol; 1998; 69(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 9695151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A method to absorb scattered radiation without attenuation of the primary beam. Moore R; Korbuly D; Amplatz K Radiology; 1976 Sep; 120(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 948608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of automatic exposure controls in mammography. Karila KT Med Phys; 1982; 9(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 7162476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variations in x-ray exposures to patients. Taylor KW; Patt NL; Johns HE J Can Assoc Radiol; 1979 Mar; 30(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 429443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of automatic exposure controls when used with rare-earth intensifying screens. Olson A; High M Radiology; 1981 Aug; 140(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 7255727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct radiographic magnification: evaluation of three microfocus x-ray tubes. De Smet AA; Fritz SL; Templeton AW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Jan; 138(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 6976689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative efficiencies of energy to photographic density conversions in typical screen-film systems. Vyborny CJ; Metz CE; Doi K Radiology; 1980 Aug; 136(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 7403525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiologic exchange. Patient dose can be reduced by using 105 mm photofluoro spot films instead of the screen-film cassette spot radiographs. Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED Radiol Technol; 1989; 60(6):515-6. PubMed ID: 2762541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Physics overview of screen-film radiography. Ritenour ER Radiographics; 1996 Jul; 16(4):903-16. PubMed ID: 8835979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic film processing: analysis of 9 years of observations. Suleiman OH; Conway BJ; Rueter FG; Slayton RJ Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 1523318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania. Sniureviciute M; Adliene D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements. Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography. Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A comparison of various methods of x-ray sensitometry]. Maslov LA; Gurvich AM; Chikirdin EG; Il'ina MA; Popova TA Med Tekh; 1988; (5):36-41. PubMed ID: 3200152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. X-ray interactions. Bushberg JT Radiographics; 1998; 18(2):457-68. PubMed ID: 9536489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Quality assurance through constancy control for x-ray film processors (author's transl)]. Weberling R Rontgenblatter; 1982 Jun; 35(6):248-54. PubMed ID: 7089438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]