These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12510511)

  • 1. Increasing your response rate for mail survey data collection.
    Mailey SK
    SCI Nurs; 2002; 19(2):78-9. PubMed ID: 12510511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Telephone vs. mail surveys. Which is best for post-discharge data collection?
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Nov; 14(3):4-6. PubMed ID: 10175266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [It's possible to increase the response rate to postal questionnaires].
    Eaker S
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Oct; 99(44):4380. PubMed ID: 12469586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phone inquiries less revealing than mail-back surveys--study.
    Morrissey J
    Mod Healthc; 1995 Jun; 25(23):30. PubMed ID: 10142718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nutrition knowledge and behavioral assessment of participants of Aid for Families with Dependent Children: telephone vs mail data collection methods.
    Derrickson J; Maeda I; Sonomura S; Braun K
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1995 Oct; 95(10):1154-5. PubMed ID: 7560689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific misconduct: ORI survey is flawed.
    Teitelbaum SL
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739-40. PubMed ID: 12490917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survey research in dermatology: guidelines for success.
    Asarch A; Chiu A; Kimball AB; Dellavalle RP
    Dermatol Clin; 2009 Apr; 27(2):121-31, vi. PubMed ID: 19254655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An introductory letter in advance of a telephone survey may increase response rate.
    Majowicz SE; Edge VL; Flint J; Sockett P; Doré K; McDougall L; Remple V; Fyfe M; Henson S; Gaebel K
    Can Commun Dis Rep; 2004 Jul; 30(13):121-3. PubMed ID: 15248524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Phone prompt or mailed reminder for increasing response rate among investigators? A randomized trial in the Sentinelles network].
    Czernichow S; Flahault A
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2001 Feb; 49(1):93-4. PubMed ID: 11226922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparability of skin screening histories obtained by telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires: a randomized crossover study.
    Aitken JF; Youl PH; Janda M; Elwood M; Ring IT; Lowe JB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 160(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 15353421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity of a questionnaire for data collection on venous thrombosis.
    Vossen CY; van Korlaar IM; Cushman M; Rosendaal FR; Bovill EG
    Thromb Res; 2004; 114(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 15381389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Questionnaires--how to reach high response rates?].
    Zwisler JE; Jarbøl DE; Lous J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Feb; 166(7):575-8. PubMed ID: 15005038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dietary intake measurement: cues to improve accuracy.
    Jardack PM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Aug; 106(8):1217-8. PubMed ID: 16863717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postal surveys versus electronic mail surveys. The tortoise and the hare revisited.
    Mavis BE; Brocato JJ
    Eval Health Prof; 1998 Sep; 21(3):395-408. PubMed ID: 10350958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chapter VII. Nonsampling bias and variance in the SRC Telephone Survey data.
    Groves RM; Magilavy LJ
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):47-50. PubMed ID: 15791756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of mail and telephone in assessing patient experiences in receiving care from medical group practices.
    Hepner KA; Brown JA; Hays RD
    Eval Health Prof; 2005 Dec; 28(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 16272420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chapter I. Study design.
    Cannell CF; Groves RM; Miller PV; Thornberry OT
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):5-10. PubMed ID: 15791750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chapter VI. Measurement of interviewer errors in the SRC Telephone Survey.
    Groves RM; Magilavy LJ
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):40-6. PubMed ID: 15791755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys.
    Maguire KB
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3528-33. PubMed ID: 19647362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.
    Thorpe C; Ryan B; McLean SL; Burt A; Stewart M; Brown JB; Reid GJ; Harris S
    Fam Pract; 2009 Feb; 26(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 19074758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.