These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12511022)

  • 1. Substance or style? An investigation of the NEO-PI-R validity scales.
    Morey LC; Quigley BD; Sanislow CA; Skodol AE; McGlashan TH; Shea MT; Stout RL; Zanarini MC; Gunderson JG
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Dec; 79(3):583-99. PubMed ID: 12511022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria.
    Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA; Berry DT
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Jun; 74(3):472-88. PubMed ID: 10900573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validity and utility of the positive presentation management and negative presentation management scales for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.
    Sellbom M; Bagby RM
    Assessment; 2008 Jun; 15(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 18463407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The utility of the NEO-PI-R validity scales to detect response distortion: a comparison with the MMPI-2.
    Morasco BJ; Gfeller JD; Elder KA
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Jun; 88(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 17518549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample.
    Decuyper M; De Fruyt F; Buschman J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 18790537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research Validity Scales for the NEO-PI-R: additional evidence for reliability and validity.
    Young MS; Schinka JA
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Jun; 76(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 11499455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic response consistency and protocol validity in structured personality assessment: the case of the NEO-PI-R.
    Kurtz JE; Parrish CL
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Apr; 76(2):315-32. PubMed ID: 11393463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The MCMI-III personality disorders scores predicted by the NEO-FFI-R and the ZKPQ-50-CC: a comparative study.
    Aluja A; García LF; Cuevas L; García O
    J Pers Disord; 2007 Feb; 21(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 17373890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study of affective temperaments in Hungary: internal consistency and concurrent validity of the TEMPS-A against the TCI and NEO-PI-R.
    Rózsa S; Rihmer Z; Gonda X; Szili I; Rihmer A; Ko N; Németh A; Pestality P; Bagdy G; Alhassoon O; Akiskal KK; Akiskal HS
    J Affect Disord; 2008 Feb; 106(1-2):45-53. PubMed ID: 17706791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of positive impression management on the NEO Personality Inventory--Revised in a clinical population.
    Ballenger JF; Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA
    Psychol Assess; 2001 Jun; 13(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 11433800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factor structure of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire and its relationship with the revised NEO personality inventory in a Japanese sample.
    Maruta T; Yamate T; Iimori M; Kato M; Livesley WJ
    Compr Psychiatry; 2006; 47(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 17067879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised in an outpatient sample.
    Fossati A; Cloninger CR; Villa D; Borroni S; Grazioli F; Giarolli L; Battaglia M; Maffei C
    Compr Psychiatry; 2007; 48(4):380-7. PubMed ID: 17560961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of NEO-PI-R research validity scales for discriminating analog malingering and genuine psychopathology.
    Berry DT; Bagby RM; Smerz J; Rinaldo JC; Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Jun; 76(3):496-516. PubMed ID: 11499461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing two alternative measures of general personality in the assessment of psychopathy: a test of the NEO PI-R and the MPQ.
    Gaughan ET; Miller JD; Pryor LR; Lynam DR
    J Pers; 2009 Aug; 77(4):965-96. PubMed ID: 19558446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: development and initial validation.
    Schinka JA; Kinder BN; Kremer T
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Feb; 68(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 16370773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining the utility of general models of personality in the study of psychopathy: a comparison of the HEXACO-PI-R and NEO PI-R.
    Gaughan ET; Miller JD; Lynam DR
    J Pers Disord; 2012 Aug; 26(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 22867503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dimensional personality traits and the prediction of DSM-IV personality disorder symptom counts in a nonclinical sample.
    Bagby RM; Marshall MB; Georgiades S
    J Pers Disord; 2005 Feb; 19(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 15899720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the five factors of personality in adolescents: the junior version of the Spanish NEO-PI-R.
    Ortet G; Ibáñez MI; Moya J; Villa H; Viruela A; Mezquita L
    Assessment; 2012 Mar; 19(1):114-30. PubMed ID: 21622482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory.
    Saucier G
    J Pers Assess; 1998 Apr; 70(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 9697330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental manipulation of NEO-PI-R items.
    Haigler ED; Widiger TA
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Oct; 77(2):339-58. PubMed ID: 11693863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.