These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12511619)
21. All clones are not the same. Gazzaniga M N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A33. PubMed ID: 16502528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A postmodernist take on the human embryo research debate. Noah L Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1133-61. PubMed ID: 15868678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Standing up for stem cell research. N Y Times Web; 2006 Jul; ():A20. PubMed ID: 16874934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Much ado about mutton? Greenberg DS Lancet; 1997 Jun; 349(9068):1850. PubMed ID: 11654834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Embryonic stem cell research: will President Bush's limitation on federal funding put the United States at a disadvantage? A comparison between U.S. and international law. Stevens D Houst J Int Law; 2003; 25(3):623-53. PubMed ID: 15199940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Reaction to President Bush's decision on embryonic stem-cell research. Fiorenza J; Keeler W; Rigali J; D'Arcy J; Law B; O'Malley S; Flynn H; Bevilacqua A; McCarrick T; Egan E; O'Steen D; Maida A; Place M Origins; 2001 Aug; 31(12):205, 207-13. PubMed ID: 11838493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. To ban or not to ban? Gorman C Time; 1997 Jun; 149(24):66. PubMed ID: 11656687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Stem cell research: is the law preventing progress? Enmon JL Utah Law Rev; 2002; (3):621-48. PubMed ID: 15156897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ban cloning? Why NBAC is wrong. Wolf SM Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):12-5. PubMed ID: 9383659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning. Doerflinger RM Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Cloning and stem cells--handicapping the political and scientific debates. Daley GQ N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(3):211-2. PubMed ID: 12867604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The bioethics agenda and the Bush second term. Cohen E New Atlantis; 2004 Fall-2005 Winter; 7():11-8. PubMed ID: 15812948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Greater regulation of fertility encouraged. Bioethics Council seeking changes. Weiss R Washington Post; 2004 Apr; ():A8. PubMed ID: 15250092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Recommendation is near on embryo cell research: ethics panel expected to urge end to ban. Wade N N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11648121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. President's Council on Bioethics: reproduction and responsibility. Doerflinger RM Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 15452926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The politics of bioethics. Cohen E; Kristol W Hum Life Rev; 2004; 30(2):7-15. PubMed ID: 15540375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Scientists urge bigger supply of stem cells: report backs cloning to create new lines. Stolberg SG N Y Times Web; 2001 Sep; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 12156473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Science policy. Cloning bills proliferate in U.S. Congress. Vogel G Science; 2001 May; 292(5519):1037. PubMed ID: 11352035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Human cloning. New players, same debate in Congress. Malakoff D Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5608):799. PubMed ID: 12574586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. F.D.A. stand on cloning raises even more questions. Stolberg SG N Y Times Web; 1998 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]