56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12511684)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.
Cole EB; Pisano ED; Kistner EO; Muller KE; Brown ME; Feig SA; Jong RA; Maidment AD; Staiger MJ; Kuzmiak CM; Freimanis RI; Lesko N; Rosen EL; Walsh R; Williford M; Braeuning MP
Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 12511684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study.
Hendrick RE; Cole EB; Pisano ED; Acharyya S; Marques H; Cohen MA; Jong RA; Mawdsley GE; Kanal KM; D'Orsi CJ; Rebner M; Gatsonis C
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 18372463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic density assessed on paired raw and processed digital images and on paired screen-film and digital images across three mammography systems.
Burton A; Byrnes G; Stone J; Tamimi RM; Heine J; Vachon C; Ozmen V; Pereira A; Garmendia ML; Scott C; Hipwell JH; Dickens C; Schüz J; Aribal ME; Bertrand K; Kwong A; Giles GG; Hopper J; Pérez Gómez B; Pollán M; Teo SH; Mariapun S; Taib NA; Lajous M; Lopez-Riduara R; Rice M; Romieu I; Flugelman AA; Ursin G; Qureshi S; Ma H; Lee E; Sirous R; Sirous M; Lee JW; Kim J; Salem D; Kamal R; Hartman M; Miao H; Chia KS; Nagata C; Vinayak S; Ndumia R; van Gils CH; Wanders JO; Peplonska B; Bukowska A; Allen S; Vinnicombe S; Moss S; Chiarelli AM; Linton L; Maskarinec G; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF; Dos-Santos-Silva I; McCormack VA
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 18(1):130. PubMed ID: 27993168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic correction of performance drift under acquisition shift in medical image classification.
Roschewitz M; Khara G; Yearsley J; Sharma N; James JJ; Ambrózay É; Heroux A; Kecskemethy P; Rijken T; Glocker B
Nat Commun; 2023 Oct; 14(1):6608. PubMed ID: 37857643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel method to assess incompleteness of mammography reports.
Gimenez FJ; Wu Y; Burnside ES; Rubin DL
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2014; 2014():1758-67. PubMed ID: 25954448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved sensitivity and specificity of mammograms by producing uniform luminance from viewboxes.
Waynant RW; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmerak R; Suleiman O; Rowberg A
J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):189-91. PubMed ID: 9735466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Correction: Deep learning for detection of iso-dense, obscure masses in mammographically dense breasts.
Rangarajan K; Aggarwal P; Gupta DK; Dhanakshirur R; Baby A; Pal C; Gupta AK; Hari S; Banerjee S; Arora C
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; 33(11):8398. PubMed ID: 37347431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated 3D Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography Programs in Dense Breast: Literature Review and Metanalysis.
Gatta G; Somma F; Sardu C; De Chiara M; Massafra R; Fanizzi A; La Forgia D; Cuccurullo V; Iovino F; Clemente A; Marfella R; Grezia GD
J Pers Med; 2023 Dec; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 38138910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation Dose Reduction in Digital Mammography by Deep-Learning Algorithm Image Reconstruction: A Preliminary Study.
Ha SM; Kim HH; Kang E; Seo BK; Choi N; Kim TH; Ku YJ; Ye JC
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi; 2022 Mar; 83(2):344-359. PubMed ID: 36237936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between breast density, age, and mammographic lesion type among Chinese breast cancer patients from a large clinical dataset.
Ji Y; Li B; Zhao R; Zhang Y; Liu J; Lu H
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Mar; 21(1):43. PubMed ID: 33685388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods Used in Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammograms: A Review.
Ramadan SZ
J Healthc Eng; 2020; 2020():9162464. PubMed ID: 32300474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatially-variant image-based modeling of PSF deformations with application to a limited angle geometry from a dual-panel breast-PET imager.
Gravel P; Surti S; Krishnamoorthy S; Karp JS; Matej S
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Nov; 64(22):225015. PubMed ID: 31569078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Using Mammography-Based Radiomics Method.
Yang J; Wang T; Yang L; Wang Y; Li H; Zhou X; Zhao W; Ren J; Li X; Tian J; Huang L
Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4429. PubMed ID: 30872652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiologists can detect the 'gist' of breast cancer before any overt signs of cancer appear.
Brennan PC; Gandomkar Z; Ekpo EU; Tapia K; Trieu PD; Lewis SJ; Wolfe JM; Evans KK
Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8717. PubMed ID: 29880817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preliminary Results of a New Auxiliary Mechatronic Near-Field Radar System to 3D Mammography for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.
Ghanbarzadeh Dagheyan A; Molaei A; Obermeier R; Westwood A; Martinez A; Martinez Lorenzo JA
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jan; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 29370106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image-based Modeling of PSF Deformation with Application to Limited Angle PET Data.
Matej S; Li Y; Panetta J; Karp JS; Surti S
IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2016 Oct; 63(5):2599-2606. PubMed ID: 27812222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.
Tosteson AN; Fryback DG; Hammond CS; Hanna LG; Grove MR; Brown M; Wang Q; Lindfors K; Pisano ED
JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Jun; 174(6):954-61. PubMed ID: 24756610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radionuclide methods and instrumentation for breast cancer detection and diagnosis.
Surti S
Semin Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 43(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 23725989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of visual grading and free-response ROC analyses for assessment of image-processing algorithms in digital mammography.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Claus F; Jacobs J; Oyen R; Bosmans H
Br J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 85(1020):e1233-41. PubMed ID: 22844032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammographic image denoising and enhancement using the Anscombe transformation, adaptive wiener filtering, and the modulation transfer function.
Romualdo LC; Vieira MA; Schiabel H; Mascarenhas ND; Borges LR
J Digit Imaging; 2013 Apr; 26(2):183-97. PubMed ID: 22806627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
