These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12511910)

  • 1. Enzo Biochem v. Gen-Probe: complying with the written description requirement under US patent law.
    Blaug S; Shuster M; Su H
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 12511910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the viability of the Lilly doctrine on the decline?
    Walker BW; Carty SM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):943-4. PubMed ID: 12894207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 'Lilly doctrine' is viable and critical.
    Caltrider SP; Kelley JJ
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Oct; 21(10):1131-2. PubMed ID: 14520388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining the meaning of claim terms.
    Auer HE
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Jan; 24(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 16404391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Australia experiments with 'experimental use' exemption.
    McBratney A; Nielsen K; McMillan F
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Aug; 22(8):1023-5. PubMed ID: 15286651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The coming US patent opposition.
    Apple T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Feb; 23(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 15696151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Encouraging further innovation: Ariad v. Eli Lilly and the written description requirement.
    Jakas J
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2012; 42(3):1287-36. PubMed ID: 22803220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protecting rights to early-stage technology.
    Shuster MJ; Su H; Blaug S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):701-3. PubMed ID: 12776151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time waits for no man: deciding when to file a patent application in Europe.
    White NL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jun; 25(6):639-41. PubMed ID: 17557096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US courts narrow patent exemptions.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):834. PubMed ID: 12894182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collaborative research presents special problems for patent seekers.
    Thorne LW; Ergenzinger ER; Spruill WM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jul; 22(7):901-2. PubMed ID: 15229550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proposed changes to patent code loom over biotech industry.
    Coombs A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):1333-4. PubMed ID: 18066010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equivalents in biotechnology patents.
    Auer HE
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 12610574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cabilly patent finale.
    Waltz E
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Aug; 26(8):846. PubMed ID: 18688222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biotechs sue Columbia over fourth Axel patent.
    Howard K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):955-6. PubMed ID: 12949538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. US court case to define EST patentability.
    Lawrence S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 May; 23(5):513. PubMed ID: 15877055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inter partes reexamination: a potentially useful approach to challenging invalid biotechnology patents.
    Derzko NM; Behringer JW
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):823-5. PubMed ID: 12833101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science and the law. Working through the patent problem.
    Walsh JP; Cohen WM; Arora A
    Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1021. PubMed ID: 12586928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who deserves the patent pot of gold?: an inquiry into the proper inventorship of patient-based discoveries.
    Ho CM
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2004; 7(2):185-243. PubMed ID: 15675072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of getting inventorship right.
    Sheiness D; Canady K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Feb; 24(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 16465154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.