BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12512623)

  • 1. Evaluating sire selection practices using lifetime net income functions.
    Cassell BG; Jobst SM; McGilliard ML; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Dec; 85(12):3492-502. PubMed ID: 12512623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple-trait prediction of transmitting abilities for herd life and estimation of economic weights using relative net income adjusted for opportunity cost.
    Weigel DJ; Cassell BG; Hoeschele I; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Mar; 78(3):639-47. PubMed ID: 7782520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of transmitting abilities for productive life and lifetime profitability from production, somatic cell count, and type traits in milk markets for fluid milk and cheese.
    Weigel DJ; Cassell BG; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 Jul; 80(7):1398-405. PubMed ID: 9241602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of controlling instruments for improvements in cow sire selection.
    König S; Lessner S; Simianer H
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Apr; 90(4):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17369238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Timeliness and effectiveness of progeny testing through artificial insemination.
    Norman HD; Powell RL; Wright JR; Sattler CG
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Apr; 86(4):1513-25. PubMed ID: 12741578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimates of genetic trend in an artificial insemination progeny test program and their association with herd characteristics.
    Meinert TR; Pearson RE; Hoyt RS
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Aug; 75(8):2254-64. PubMed ID: 1401375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationships of sire predicted transmitting ability for somatic cell score with measures of daughter performance.
    Cranford JL; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jun; 84(6):1501-7. PubMed ID: 11417710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Simianer H; Willam A
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):382-91. PubMed ID: 19109296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost comparison of natural service sires and artificial insemination for dairy cattle reproductive management.
    Overton MW
    Theriogenology; 2005 Aug; 64(3):589-602. PubMed ID: 15963558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Major advances in determining appropriate selection goals.
    Shook GE
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Apr; 89(4):1349-61. PubMed ID: 16537966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Holsteins selected for high and average milk production. 1. Net income and production response to selection for milk.
    Dunklee JS; Freeman AE; Kelley DH
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jul; 77(7):1890-6. PubMed ID: 7929950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Producer breeding objectives and optimal sire selection.
    Tozer PR; Stokes JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Dec; 85(12):3518-25. PubMed ID: 12512626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of most recent evaluations of Holstein bulls from first available pedigree information.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):670-6. PubMed ID: 11949873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Merit of outliers for milk yield as indicators of accuracy of genetic evaluations of sires.
    Meinert TR; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Nov; 81(11):2951-5. PubMed ID: 9839239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of longevity breeding values for US Holstein sires using survival analysis methodology.
    Caraviello DZ; Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3518-25. PubMed ID: 15377631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal size of progeny groups for progeny-testing programs by artificial insemination firms.
    Dekkers JC; Vandervoort GE; Burnside EB
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Nov; 79(11):2056-70. PubMed ID: 8961113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of sire selection based on maximization of guaranteed income and risk associated with sire merit.
    Dematawewa CM; Berger PJ; Melton BE
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Mar; 81(3):807-16. PubMed ID: 9565885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of sire fertility and daughter stayability on profitability of sire selection.
    Ochoa RF; Taylor JF; Tomaszewski MA; Lacewell RD
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):3961-72. PubMed ID: 1757635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lifetime profit as an individual trait and prediction of its breeding values in Spanish Holstein cows.
    Pérez-Cabal MA; Alenda R
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Dec; 86(12):4115-22. PubMed ID: 14740852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictability of bull merit from genetic evaluations of sires and maternal grandsires using an animal model.
    Rekik B; Berger PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 May; 80(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 9178137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.