These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12512664)

  • 21. Clinical evaluation of sealants and preventive resin restorations in a group of environmentally homogeneous children.
    Lekic PC; Deng D; Brothwell D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 16734308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance of a conventional sealant and a flowable composite on minimally invasive prepared fissures.
    Francescut P; Lussi A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 17024941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The minimally invasive management of early occlusal caries: a practical guide.
    Mackenzie L; Banerjee A
    Prim Dent J; 2014 May; 3(2):34-41. PubMed ID: 25215339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: six-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Smith CD; Williams JE; Sherrer JD; Mackert JR; Richards EE; Schuster GS; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Kovarik RE
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Dec; 23(12):827-38. PubMed ID: 1305301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can caries fissures be sealed as adequately as sound fissures?
    Hevinga MA; Opdam NJ; Frencken JE; Bronkhorst EM; Truin GJ
    J Dent Res; 2008 May; 87(5):495-8. PubMed ID: 18434584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials.
    Baghdadi ZD
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The preventive resin restoration: a conservative alternative.
    McConnachie I
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Mar; 58(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 1555123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Caries detection and diagnosis, sealants and management of the possibly carious fissure.
    Deery C
    Br Dent J; 2013 Jun; 214(11):551-7. PubMed ID: 23744208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sealing occlusal caries lesions in adults referred for restorative treatment: 2-3 years of follow-up.
    Bakhshandeh A; Qvist V; Ekstrand KR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Apr; 16(2):521-9. PubMed ID: 21479565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Management of fissure caries in the community dental services using sealant restorations: a field trial.
    Gray GB; Paterson RC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Mar; 6(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 9680884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ultraconservative sealed restorations: three-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Williams JE; Schuster GS; Smith CD; Pierce KL; Mackert JR; Sherrer JD; Wenner KK; Davis QB; Garman TA
    J Public Health Dent; 1991; 51(4):239-50. PubMed ID: 1941777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effectiveness of preventive resin restorations in pediatric patients.
    Walker J; Floyd K; Jakobsen J; Pinkham JR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):338-40. PubMed ID: 8958345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of flowable composites on the clinical performance of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Szesz A; Parreiras S; Martini E; Reis A; Loguercio A
    J Dent; 2017 Oct; 65():11-21. PubMed ID: 28729119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct bonded Class I restorations and sealants: six options.
    Croll TP; Cavanaugh RR
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Mar; 28(3):157-68. PubMed ID: 9452681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro.
    Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preventive resin restorations and sealants in light of current evidence.
    Simonsen RJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 2005 Oct; 49(4):815-23, vii. PubMed ID: 16150318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Two-year results with box-only resin composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(6):395-400. PubMed ID: 8636474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Canabarro S; Lopes GC; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 14531591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two-Year Clinical Study.
    Vural UK; Kiremitçi A; Gökalp S
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e204-e209. PubMed ID: 28960769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.