BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12512672)

  • 21. Shall I go digital?
    Thomas BL; Davies J; Whaites E
    Dent Update; 2014 May; 41(4):314-6, 319-22, 325-6. PubMed ID: 24930253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiation-absorbed doses and energy imparted from panoramic tomography, cephalometric radiography, and occlusal film radiography in children.
    Bankvall G; Håkansson HA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 May; 53(5):532-40. PubMed ID: 6954429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cross-sectional tomograms obtained with four panoramic radiographic units in the assessment of implant site measurements.
    Peltola JS; Mattila M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 15585805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital panoramic and extraoral imaging.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 37(4):541-51. PubMed ID: 8224331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implementation of a Digital Radiographic Image Acquisition and Retrieval System (DRIARS) using a wireless network in an orthodontic department.
    Mupparapu M; Binder RE; Cummins JM; Feldman CA; Cappelli MA; Matheson PB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):115-23. PubMed ID: 18473035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identification of the temporomandibular joint and adjacent cephalometric landmarks using a dual sensitivity screen-cassette system.
    Hickman EW; Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Silviera A; Goldsmith J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):274-82. PubMed ID: 9161182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering.
    Svenson B; Larsson L; Båth M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 26478956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative analysis of angular cephalometric values between CBCT generated lateral cephalograms versus digitized conventional lateral cephalograms.
    Chung RR; Lagravere MO; Flores-Mir C; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW
    Int Orthod; 2009 Dec; 7(4):308-21. PubMed ID: 20303918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Research methods in dentistry 9. Follow-up of permucosal implants in an edentate mandible using panoramic radiography].
    Verhoeven JW; Cune MS
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Mar; 112(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 15792391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dentists' use of digital radiographic techniques: Part II - extraoral radiography: a questionnaire study of Swedish dentists.
    Svenson B; Ståhlnacke K; Karlsson R; Fält A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Mar; 77(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 30422025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
    Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, Part 2: Image quality.
    Forsyth DB; Shaw WC; Richmond S; Roberts CT
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8678345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of "veraviewpocs" digital panoramic X-ray system.
    Tatsumi M; Yoshiura K; Yuasa K; Tabata O; Nakayama E; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Katoh M; Kanda S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2000 Jul; 3(3):183-95. PubMed ID: 11410969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Image quality of digital and film radiographs in applications sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval.
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson PM; Håkansson J; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15272512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A novel panoramic machine for photofluorography.
    Ohba T; Nagata Y; Morimoto Y; Tanaka T; Nakamura T; Katayama H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 10202479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Simple acrylic occlusal key as a substitute of head holders in cephalometric orthopantomography.
    Badawi MS; Deheis M
    Egypt Dent J; 1986 Oct; 32(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 3467961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anatomically shaped cranial collimation (ACC) for lateral cephalometric radiography: a technical report.
    Hoogeveen RC; van der Stelt PF; Berkhout WE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(1):20130203. PubMed ID: 24170799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.
    Garcia Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Gründler K; Visser H; Hirsch E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.