These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12512685)

  • 1. Stereoacuity at distance and near.
    Wong BP; Woods RL; Peli E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 79(12):771-8. PubMed ID: 12512685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distance stereoacuity norms for the mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester in young children and young adults.
    Yildirim C; Altinsoy HI; Yakut E
    J AAPOS; 1998 Feb; 2(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 10532363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distance stereoacuity in prism-induced convergence stress.
    Laird PW; Hatt SR; Leske DA; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2008 Aug; 12(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 18378476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved stereoacuity: an indication for unilateral cataract surgery.
    Kwapiszeski BR; Gallagher CC; Holmes JM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1996 May; 22(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 8733847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlations between clinical measures and symptoms: Report 1: Stereoacuity with accommodative, vergence measures, and symptoms.
    Wajuihian SO
    J Optom; 2020; 13(3):171-184. PubMed ID: 32475793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereoacuity with balanced presbyopic contact lenses.
    Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D
    Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Jan; 94(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 21039847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stereoacuity and binocular visual acuity in prism-induced exodeviation.
    Laird PW; Hatt SR; Leske DA; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2007 Aug; 11(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 17419082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of Test Distance on Stereoacuity in Intermittent Exotropia.
    Seki Y; Wakayama A; Takahashi R; Umebara I; Tanabe F; Abe K; Shimomura Y
    Strabismus; 2017 Mar; 25(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 28156199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests.
    Fawcett SL
    J AAPOS; 2005 Dec; 9(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16414526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of convergence and divergence stress on near stereoacuity.
    Demirkilinc Biler E; Guven Yilmaz S; Kucukceran E; Uretmen O
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 37(1):165-168. PubMed ID: 27160272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantification of Stereopsis in Patients with Impaired Binocularity.
    Han SB; Yang HK; Kim J; Hong K; Lee B; Hwang JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 93(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 26927523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The visual function of professional baseball players.
    Laby DM; Rosenbaum AL; Kirschen DG; Davidson JL; Rosenbaum LJ; Strasser C; Mellman MF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1996 Oct; 122(4):476-85. PubMed ID: 8862043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Depth perception in random dot stereograms is not affected by changes in either vergence or accommodation.
    Gonzalez F; Rivadulla C; Perez R; Cadarso C
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Oct; 75(10):743-7. PubMed ID: 9798214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Borish Vectographic Nearpoint Card II contour and random dot stereoacuity in children.
    Kulp MT
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2000; 37(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 10955543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual mechanisms governing the perception of auto-stereograms.
    Gómez AT; Lupón N; Cardona G; Aznar-Casanova JA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Mar; 95(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 22023025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accommodative Function in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
    Anketell PM; Saunders KJ; Gallagher SM; Bailey C; Little JA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Mar; 95(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 29424829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
    Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The prismatic effect on stereoacuity in intermittent exotropia.
    Choi KS; Chung SA; Lee KS; Lee JB
    Yonsei Med J; 2010 Jan; 51(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 20046524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The heterophoria of 3-5 year old children as a function of viewing distance and target type.
    Troyer ME; Sreenivasan V; Peper TJ; Candy TR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27921322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of distance stereoacuity assessment in determining the effectiveness of minus lenses in intermittent exotropia.
    Koklanis K; Georgievski Z; Zhang K
    J AAPOS; 2010 Dec; 14(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 21093332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.