These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12513958)
1. Routine operative breast endoscopy during lumpectomy. Dooley WC Ann Surg Oncol; 2003; 10(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 12513958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy? Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytologic evaluation of lumpectomy margins in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical outcome. Cox CE; Hyacinthe M; Gonzalez RJ; Lyman G; Reintgen D; Ku NN; Miller MS; Greenberg H; Nicosia SV Ann Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 4(8):644-9. PubMed ID: 9416412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision? Jacobson AF; Asad J; Boolbol SK; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Feldman SM Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 18809063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Routine operative breast endoscopy for bloody nipple discharge. Dooley WC Ann Surg Oncol; 2002 Nov; 9(9):920-3. PubMed ID: 12417516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ. Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of analysis of frozen-section margin on reoperation rates in women undergoing lumpectomy for breast cancer: evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Boughey JC; Hieken TJ; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Grant CS; Farley DR; Thomsen KM; Osborn JB; Keeney GL; Habermann EB Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 24929768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinicopathologic significance of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast core needle biopsies with invasive cancer. Jimenez RE; Bongers S; Bouwman D; Segel M; Visscher DW Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Jan; 24(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 10632496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of ductal carcinoma in situ with nipple discharge. Intraductal spreading of carcinoma is an unfavorable pathologic factor for breast-conserving surgery. Ohuchi N; Furuta A; Mori S Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1294-302. PubMed ID: 8055451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Preoperative MR mammography in breast carcinoma. Effect on operative treatment from the surgical viewpoint]. Gatzemeier W; Liersch T; Stylianou A; Buttler A; Becker H; Fischer U Chirurg; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1460-8. PubMed ID: 10637703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Controversies in the local management of invasive and non-invasive breast cancer. Page DL; Johnson JE Cancer Lett; 1995 Mar; 90(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 7720047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The presence of proliferative breast disease with atypia does not significantly influence outcome in early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation. Fowble B; Hanlon AL; Patchefsky A; Freedman G; Hoffman JP; Sigurdson ER; Goldstein LJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Aug; 42(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 9747827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia: a probabilistic approach to reporting. Ely KA; Carter BA; Jensen RA; Simpson JF; Page DL Am J Surg Pathol; 2001 Aug; 25(8):1017-21. PubMed ID: 11474285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lumpectomy with and without radiation for early-stage breast cancer and DCIS. Marks LB; Prosnitz LR Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Sep; 11(9):1361-8, 1371; discussion 1372, 1374. PubMed ID: 9306425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ treated with conservative surgery with or without radiation therapy: patterns of failure and 10-year results. Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Martinez AA; Rebner M; Balasubramaniam M; Frazier RC; Register JT; Pettinga J; Vicini FA Ann Surg; 2000 Feb; 231(2):235-45. PubMed ID: 10674616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of microcalcifications that develop at the lumpectomy site after breast-conserving therapy. Vora SA; Wazer DE; Homer MJ Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):667-71. PubMed ID: 9169686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and atypia of uncertain significance in core biopsies from mammographically detected lesions: correlation with excision diagnosis. Harvey JM; Sterrett GF; Frost FA Pathology; 2002 Oct; 34(5):410-6. PubMed ID: 12408338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Gibson GR; Lesnikoski BA; Yoo J; Mott LA; Cady B; Barth RJ Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Oct; 8(9):693-704. PubMed ID: 11597009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Follow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ: a correlative study of 33 patients with review of the literature. Elsheikh TM; Silverman JF Am J Surg Pathol; 2005 Apr; 29(4):534-43. PubMed ID: 15767810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoperative ultrasound can decrease the re-excision lumpectomy rate in patients with palpable breast cancers. Davis KM; Hsu CH; Bouton ME; Wilhelmson KL; Komenaka IK Am Surg; 2011 Jun; 77(6):720-5. PubMed ID: 21679640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]