160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12514073)
1. Human sperm survival assay as a bioassay for the assisted reproductive technologies laboratory.
De Jonge CJ; Centola GM; Reed ML; Shabanowitz RB; Simon SD; Quinn P
J Androl; 2003; 24(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 12514073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Semen analysis: its place in modern reproductive medical practice.
McLachlan RI; Baker HW; Clarke GN; Harrison KL; Matson PL; Holden CA; de Kretser DM; ; ;
Pathology; 2003 Feb; 35(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 12701680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82 Suppl 1():S51-4. PubMed ID: 15363694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Guidelines for sperm donation.
American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Fertil Steril; 2002 Jun; 77(6 Suppl 5):S2-5. PubMed ID: 12069859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mouse embryonic stem cells for quality control testing in assisted reproductive technology programs.
Kim JJ; Patton WC; Corselli J; Jacobson JD; King A; Chan PJ
J Reprod Med; 2005 Jul; 50(7):533-8. PubMed ID: 16130852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extended culture of human spermatozoa in the laboratory may have practical value in the assisted reproductive procedures.
Hossain AM; Osuamkpe CO; Nagamani M
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):237-9. PubMed ID: 17482167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5 Suppl):S202-5. PubMed ID: 19007631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High quality sperm for nonhuman primate ART: production and assessment.
VandeVoort CA
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2004 Jun; 2():33. PubMed ID: 15200678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revised minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies.
;
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5 Suppl 1):S53-6. PubMed ID: 17055846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Revised minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82 Suppl 1():S4-7. PubMed ID: 15363681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of analytical and biological variation on the clinical interpretation of seminal parameters.
Castilla JA; Alvarez C; Aguilar J; González-Varea C; Gonzalvo MC; Martínez L
Hum Reprod; 2006 Apr; 21(4):847-51. PubMed ID: 16361288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo and in vitro decondensation of human sperm and assisted reproduction technologies.
Caglar GS; Hammadeh M; Asimakopoulos B; Nikolettos N; Diedrich K; Al-Hassani S
In Vivo; 2005; 19(3):623-30. PubMed ID: 15875785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current trends in evaluation of sperm function: in vitro selection and manipulation of male gametes for assisted conception.
Varghese AC; Sinha B; Bhattaccharyya AK
Indian J Exp Biol; 2005 Nov; 43(11):1023-31. PubMed ID: 16313065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Improvement of results and optimization of quality control].
Achour-Frydman N
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Aug; 37 Suppl 1():S1-3. PubMed ID: 18786462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Internal quality control : false-rejections and preliminary period].
Marquis P
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2001; 59(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 11282527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Symposium on quality assurance programmes.
Malays J Pathol; 1987 Aug; 9():1-25. PubMed ID: 3452704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Application study of human sperm motility bioassay in IVF laboratory quality control].
Cai X; Pomeroy KO; Mattox JH
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Jul; 12(7):625-8. PubMed ID: 16894942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Double-quality control reveals high-level toxicity in gloves used for operator protection in assisted reproductive technology.
Lierman S; De Sutter P; Dhont M; Van der Elst J
Fertil Steril; 2007 Oct; 88(4 Suppl):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17467705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Fertil Steril; 2004 Apr; 81(4):1168-71. PubMed ID: 15066499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reprotoxicity of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer disposables and products: a 4-year survey.
Nijs M; Franssen K; Cox A; Wissmann D; Ruis H; Ombelet W
Fertil Steril; 2009 Aug; 92(2):527-35. PubMed ID: 18937937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
