BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12514515)

  • 1. [Abstract quality assessment of articles from the Annales de Dermatologie].
    Khosrotehrani K; Dupuy A; Lebbé C; Rybojad M; Morel P
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2002 Nov; 129(11):1271-5. PubMed ID: 12514515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of abstracts in 3 clinical dermatology journals.
    Dupuy A; Khosrotehrani K; Lebbé C; Rybojad M; Morel P
    Arch Dermatol; 2003 May; 139(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 12756095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality and content of abstracts in papers reporting about drug exposures during pregnancy.
    Einarson TR; Lee C; Smith R; Manley J; Perstin J; Loniewska M; Zahedi P; Abu-Ghazalah R; Einarson A
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Aug; 76(8):621-8. PubMed ID: 16955494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The structured summary: a tool for reader and author].
    Comans ML; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Dec; 134(48):2338-43. PubMed ID: 2255376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the quality of abstract reporting for phase I cancer trials.
    Strevel EL; Chau NG; Pond GR; Murgo AJ; Ivy PS; Siu LL
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Mar; 14(6):1782-7. PubMed ID: 18347180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Structured abstracting of scientific medical publications].
    Dabrowiecki S; Malukiewicz-Wiśniewska G
    Przegl Lek; 1995; 52(3):105-8. PubMed ID: 7644674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structured abstracts in MEDLINE, 1989-1991.
    Harbourt AM; Knecht LS; Humphreys BL
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1995 Apr; 83(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 7599584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract.
    Nakayama T; Hirai N; Yamazaki S; Naito M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2005 Apr; 93(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 15858627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of abstracts of original research articles in CMAJ in 1989.
    Narine L; Yee DS; Einarson TR; Ilersich AL
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 1993292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The impact of the annual scientific meetings of the Israel Society of Rheumatology as measured by publication rates of the abstracts in peer-reviewed journals].
    Perez S; Hashkes PJ; Uziel Y
    Harefuah; 2004 Apr; 143(4):266-9, 319. PubMed ID: 15116582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
    Berwanger O; Ribeiro RA; Finkelsztejn A; Watanabe M; Suzumura EA; Duncan BB; Devereaux PJ; Cook D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.
    Taddio A; Pain T; Fassos FF; Boon H; Ilersich AL; Einarson TR
    CMAJ; 1994 May; 150(10):1611-5. PubMed ID: 8174031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structured and unstructured abstracts in journal articles: a review.
    Fatiregun AA; Asuzu MC
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2003 Sep; 10(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 14692066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Publications of French dermatology professors from 1996 to 1998].
    Bastuji-Garin S; Brouquet E; Revuz J
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2002 Dec; 129(12):1354-8. PubMed ID: 12536170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of abstracts describing randomized trials in the proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings: guidelines for improved reporting.
    Krzyzanowska MK; Pintilie M; Brezden-Masley C; Dent R; Tannock IF
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 May; 22(10):1993-9. PubMed ID: 15143092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.
    Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16978620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Contributions of parental and social influences to cannabis use in a non-clinical sample of adolescents].
    Chabrol H; Mabila JD; Chauchard E; Mantoulan R; Rousseau A
    Encephale; 2008 Jan; 34(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 18514145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine.
    Rubin HR; Redelmeier DA; Wu AW; Steinberg EP
    J Gen Intern Med; 1993 May; 8(5):255-8. PubMed ID: 8505684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality assessment of reviewers' reports using a simple instrument.
    Landkroon AP; Euser AM; Veeken H; Hart W; Overbeke AJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 108(4):979-85. PubMed ID: 17012462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting of randomized clinical trial descriptors and use of structured abstracts.
    Scherer RW; Crawley B
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 9676678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.