These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. A comparison of the delta copper T and the copper T 200 in Bologna, Italy. Melega C; Biscontin S; Canedi L; Marchesini FP; Tirelli S; Bartolotti T; Flamigni C Acta Eur Fertil; 1986; 17(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 3727892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Advantages and disadvantages of IUD insertion immediately after abortion]. Matrljan I; Randić L Jugosl Ginekol Opstet; 1982; 22(1-2):43-5. PubMed ID: 7132427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Barriers associated with the failure to return for intrauterine device insertion following first-trimester abortion. Stanek AM; Bednarek PH; Nichols MD; Jensen JT; Edelman AB Contraception; 2009 Mar; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 19185676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Return to fertility in nulliparous and parous women after removal of the GyneFix intrauterine contraceptive system. Delbarge W; Bátár I; Bafort M; Bonnivert J; Colmant C; Dhont M; Fonzé V; Gevers R; Janssens D; Lavalley P; Salmin E; Degueldre M; Vrijens M; Van Kets H; Wildemeersch D Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Mar; 7(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12041861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intrauterine device termination rates and the menstrual cycle day of insertion. White MK; Ory HW; Rooks JB; Rochat RW Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Feb; 55(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 7352085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Our experience with the IUD (contraceptive loop) inserted immediately after interruption of pregnancy]. Szereday Z; Oroján I; Szontágh F Orv Hetil; 1970 Sep; 111(39):2299-300. PubMed ID: 5472491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of side-effects of Cu-T as intra-uterine contraceptive device in post medical termination of pregnancy and interval cases. Das CR; Pradhan G J Indian Med Assoc; 1995 Oct; 93(10):375-6. PubMed ID: 9053409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The decline in popularity of the intrauterine device. A survey of general practitioner attitudes and practices in New South Wales. Weisberg E; Fraser IS; Goss S Med J Aust; 1994 Jan; 160(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 8271978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. IUDs: current perspectives. Hepburn S Curr Ther (Seaforth); 1994 Oct; 35(10):49-55. PubMed ID: 12319352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Use of intrauterine devices (IUD) in nulliparous young women]. Marchino GL; Mimmo B; Grio R; Garyphallides N Minerva Ginecol; 1986 Apr; 38(4):291-3. PubMed ID: 3725168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [IUD (MLCu 375) insertion following induced abortion]. Guilhemsans MO Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1993 Dec; 21(12):903-6. PubMed ID: 12318994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Experiences with the insertion of IUD after artifical abortion]. Tichý M; Havránek F Cesk Gynekol; 1972 Sep; 37(7):502-3. PubMed ID: 5077968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intrauterine devices (IUDs) and their complications (clinical evaluation of 2013 women with IUD in-situ). Ayhan A; Ozalp S; Aslan A Acta Reprod Turc; 1982 Oct; 4(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 12267258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Intrauterine devices in the immediate, early and late postabortion period]. Nun S Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1971; 36(6):326-33. PubMed ID: 5163477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]