198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12515331)
1. Quality assurance in follow-up and initial treatment for screening mammography programs in 22 countries.
Klabunde CN; Sancho-Garnier H; Taplin S; Thoresen S; Ohuchi N; Ballard-Barbash R;
Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Dec; 14(6):449-61. PubMed ID: 12515331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison.
Klabunde C; Bouchard F; Taplin S; Scharpantgen A; Ballard-Barbash R;
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Mar; 55(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 11160176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer screening in 21 countries: delivery of services, notification of results and outcomes ascertainment.
Ballard-Barbash R; Klabunde C; Paci E; Broeders M; Coleman EA; Fracheboud J; Bouchard F; Rennert G; Shapiro S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1999 Oct; 8(5):417-26. PubMed ID: 10548397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries.
Hendrick RE; Klabunde C; Grivegnee A; Pou G; Ballard-Barbash R
Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Jun; 14(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 12108532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: can it be done?
Yankaskas BC; Klabunde CN; Ancelle-Park R; Renner G; Wang H; Fracheboud J; Pou G; Bulliard JL;
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 15624239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality assurance audits of community screening mammography practices: availability of active follow-up for data collection and outcome assessment.
Brown ML; Houn F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):825-9. PubMed ID: 8092017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality assurance for screening mammography data collection systems in 22 countries.
Klabunde CN; Sancho-Garnier H; Broeders M; Thoresen S; Rodrigues VJ; Ballard-Barbash R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(4):528-41. PubMed ID: 11758297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines. International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer Screening.
Shapiro S; Coleman EA; Broeders M; Codd M; de Koning H; Fracheboud J; Moss S; Paci E; Stachenko S; Ballard-Barbash R
Int J Epidemiol; 1998 Oct; 27(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 9839727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer screening--the European experience.
Perry NM
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2004; 49(5):228-30. PubMed ID: 15633481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance in mammography. Accreditation, legislation, and compliance with quality assurance standards.
Hendrick RE
Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 1732931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Follow-up of abnormal results in an urban community-based breast cancer screening program.
Fillmore CM; Beekman SR; Farmer BJ; Gold ML
WMJ; 2003; 102(5):46-7. PubMed ID: 14621931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and implementation of a quality assurance program for mammography.
de Paredes ES; Frazier AB; Hartwell GD; Strash AM; Scheer C; Smith DC; Barnette PA; Noel W; Kenneweg D
Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3823463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The development and implementation of standards of care in a breast cancer screening program.
Nielsen B; Miaskowski C; McCoy C; Rudisch M
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1991; 18(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 2003118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Chlebowski RT; Robbins JA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 12644536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: assessment of technical quality by external review.
Baines CJ; Miller AB; Kopans DB; Moskowitz M; Sanders DE; Sickles EA; To T; Wall C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Oct; 155(4):743-7; discussion 748-9. PubMed ID: 2119103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program.
Kan L; Olivotto IA; Warren Burhenne LJ; Sickles EA; Coldman AJ
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):563-7. PubMed ID: 10796940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond the mammography quality standards act: measuring the quality of breast cancer screening programs.
Rauscher GH; Murphy AM; Orsi JM; Dupuy DM; Grabler PM; Weldon CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 24261339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening mammography after breast cancer treatment: patterns in community practice.
Krishnaraj A; Yankaskas BC; Stearns SC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 May; 97(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 16331348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer screening in Canada: a review.
Wadden N; Doyle GP
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2005 Dec; 56(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 16579020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Quality assurance in organized screening of breast cancer].
De Landtsheer JP; Delaloye JF; Lepori D; De Grandi P; Levi F
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2003 May; 123(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 15095710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
