These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The effects of industrial airborne ultrasound on humans. Acton WI Ultrasonics; 1974 May; 12(3):124-8. PubMed ID: 4596829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Letter: Exposure criteria for industrial ultrasound. Acton WI Ann Occup Hyg; 1975 Dec; 18(3):267-8. PubMed ID: 1217799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Results and prospects of the development of studies of occupational hygiene in exposure to ultrasound]. Prokopenko LV Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1987 Nov; (11):43-7. PubMed ID: 3325360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Environmental factors and health. Ultrasound (Environmental Health Criteria 22)]. Zubovskiĭ GA; Vasil'chenko SA Med Radiol (Mosk); 1984 Oct; 29(10):65-70. PubMed ID: 6390060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Contact ultrasound and its hygienic importance as a factor of the industrial environment]. Prokopenko LV Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1985 May; (5):24-7. PubMed ID: 4029688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Contribution to the problems of ultrasonics in industrial neurology]. Bohanes MR; Kratochvíl B Cesk Neurol; 1968 Jul; 31(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 5713469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The intermittent action of high frequency noise in industry]. Lipovoĭ VV Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1969 Feb; 13(2):19-21. PubMed ID: 5795548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Maximum allowable concentration: recommendations by the Japanese Association of Industrial Health, 1979]. Sangyo Igaku; 1979 Sep; 21(5):486-504. PubMed ID: 522293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Occupational hearing loss between 85 and 90 dBA. Martin RH; Gibson ES; Lockington JN J Occup Med; 1975 Jan; 17(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 1123674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Medical surveillance criteria for risk in occupational exposure to ultrasonics]. Bernardi P; Boggio M; Checcucci A; Grandolfo M; Righi E; Tamburello C; Zannoli R Med Lav; 1982; 73(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 7110045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Hygienic standardization of low-frequency ultrasonics in its industrial application]. Gorshkov SI; Roshchin AV Gig Sanit; 1969 Sep; 34(9):45-8. PubMed ID: 5379499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Scientific discussion on "The dose approach to the hygienic evaluation and standardization of environmental factors of the industrial environment and the work process"]. Kasparov AA; Suvorov GA Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1986 Oct; (10):58-60. PubMed ID: 3792901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Recommendations of maximum permissible exposure level (1984), made by Japanese Society of Industrial Health]. Sangyo Igaku; 1984 Jul; 26(4):339-64. PubMed ID: 6530816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Letter: Occupational exposure levels for novel work situations. Zielhuis RL Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1975 Sep; 36(9):A-10. PubMed ID: 1180212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Considered limited values of chemical pollutants and particles in the workroom areas, proposed by the Italian Society of Industrial Medicine and the Italian Association of Industrial Hygienists for the year 1975]. Med Lav; 1975; 66(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 1226177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Combined action of various factors in the industrial environment]. Mikhaĭlov VA; Tartakovskaia LIa; Zislin DM Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1975 Jul; (7):10-3. PubMed ID: 1165028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]