These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12515683)
1. Restructuring nuclear regulations. Mossman KL Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Jan; 111(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 12515683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. radiation protection: role of national and international recommendations and opportunities for collaboration (harmony, not dissonance). Boyd MA Health Phys; 2015 Feb; 108(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 25551510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspectives of U.S. government agencies on the potential role of greater scientific understanding of low-dose radiation effects in establishing regulatory health protection guidance. Tenforde TS; Brooks AL Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):516-8. PubMed ID: 19820462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do we combine science and regulations for decision making following a terrorist incident involving radioactive materials? Poston JW; Ford JR Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 19820465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An inspector's perspective: teamwork between licensees and regulatory agencies. Griffin JM Health Phys; 2005 Aug; 89(2 Suppl):S22-6. PubMed ID: 16010115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Expanding the scope of practice for radiology managers: radiation safety duties. Orders AB; Wright D Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(4):40-7. PubMed ID: 12918277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of the ICRP in radiation protection--a view from industry. Henrichs K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 105(1-4):29-31. PubMed ID: 14526922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is it necessary to raise awareness about technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials? Michalik B J Environ Monit; 2009 Oct; 11(10):1825-33. PubMed ID: 19809704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety evaluation for regulatory management of Australian radioisotope production facilities. Sarkar S Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1299-303. PubMed ID: 19285422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The present ICRP protection quantitites are seriously flawed. Opposing the proposition. Edwards AA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 12862250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Communication of radiation benefits and risks in decision making: some lessons learned. Locke PA Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 21979551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. NRC absorbed dose reconstruction for family member of 131I therapy patient: case study and commentary. Marcus CS; Siegel JA J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):13N-6N, 37N. PubMed ID: 15073236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A review of the history of U.S. radiation protection regulations, recommendations, and standards. Jones CG Health Phys; 2005 Jun; 88(6):697-716. PubMed ID: 15891462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. US NRC discussion of options to revise radiation protection recommendations. Cool DA Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):313-7. PubMed ID: 23089031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of the history of U.S. radiation protection regulations, recommendations, and standards. Jones CG Health Phys; 2005 Feb; 88(2):105-24. PubMed ID: 15650586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fortieth Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture: Radiation Protection and Regulatory Science. Poston JW Health Phys; 2017 Feb; 112(2):193-198. PubMed ID: 28027161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]