176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12515981)
1. Point and click.
Carroll-Johnson RM
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2003; 30(1):11. PubMed ID: 12515981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The ideal medical journal in the age of IT].
Nylenna M
Lakartidningen; 2004 Jan; 101(1-2):60-3. PubMed ID: 14763006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Journal lays bare remarks from peer reviewers.
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7077):642. PubMed ID: 16467803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Why are people reluctant to join in open review?
Liu SV
Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review is essential for both print and electronic publications.
Weller AC
MedGenMed; 2001 Nov; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 11965200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Open-access journal will publish first, judge later.
Giles J
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7123):9. PubMed ID: 17203032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reaching the tipping point: from print to online publication.
Jeng BH; Albert DM
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Jan; 131(1):90. PubMed ID: 23307215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. There are no schools for medical editors.
Seggie J
S Afr Med J; 2013 Jan; 103(2):65-6. PubMed ID: 23374308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical research and the news media.
McGettigan P; Henry D
N Engl J Med; 2005 Feb; 352(8):838-9; author reply 838-9. PubMed ID: 15736294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Further developing the profession's research mentality.
Jerome RN
J Med Libr Assoc; 2008 Oct; 96(4):287-9. PubMed ID: 18974806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pediatric cardiology: a monthly publication.
Abdulla RI
Pediatr Cardiol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 19148696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Publishers soldier on despite electronic bugs.
Dalton R
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):264. PubMed ID: 12124587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The top 10 redux.
Moore S
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2012 Jan; 39(1):11. PubMed ID: 22201649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
Cintas P
Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The tragedy of the reviewer commons.
Hochberg ME; Chase JM; Gotelli NJ; Hastings A; Naeem S
Ecol Lett; 2009 Jan; 12(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 19087107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Electronic publishing in medicine: where are we?
Pistotti V
JOP; 2001 Sep; 2(5):301-5. PubMed ID: 11877540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review and fraud.
Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7122):971-2. PubMed ID: 17183274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimenting with peer review.
Jabri E
ACS Chem Biol; 2006 Jul; 1(6):325-6. PubMed ID: 17163762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific letters.
Henly SJ
Nurs Res; 2008; 57(5):301. PubMed ID: 18794713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The journal as journalism.
Abrams SE
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(4):295-6. PubMed ID: 19573207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
