These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12516150)

  • 41. [Role of parasitological laboratories in sociohygienic monitoring].
    Guzeeva TM; Sergiev VP; Romanenko NA
    Med Parazitol (Mosk); 2006; (2):3-5. PubMed ID: 16813238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. From dermal exposure to internal dose.
    Van de Sandt JJ; Dellarco M; Van Hemmen JJ
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 1():S38-47. PubMed ID: 17440485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [The specific features of sanitary-and-epidemiological surveillance and sociohygienic monitoring under emergencies in the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania].
    Butaev TM
    Gig Sanit; 2008; (1):83. PubMed ID: 18368711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Modeling exposure to persistent chemicals in hazard and risk assessment.
    Cowan-Ellsberry CE; McLachlan MS; Arnot JA; Macleod M; McKone TE; Wania F
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):662-79. PubMed ID: 19552503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Assessing the risk from the effects of ambient air pollution on health in the sociohygienic monitoring system].
    Surzhikov DV; Surzhikov VD; Oleshchenko AM
    Gig Sanit; 2004; (5):64-6. PubMed ID: 15532503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Di-alkyl phosphate biomonitoring data: assessing cummulative exposure to organophosphate pesticides Duggan et al. (2003).
    Kissel JC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Apr; 39(2):240; author reply 241. PubMed ID: 15041153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [On the introduction of socio-hygienic monitoring in 2000-2002 and objectives of the improvement of state sanitary-epidemiological service in the Russian Federation].
    Onishchenko GG
    Gig Sanit; 2004; (3):3-7. PubMed ID: 15197845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Microbial risk assessment: don't forget the children.
    Nwachuku N; Gerba CP
    Curr Opin Microbiol; 2004 Jun; 7(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 15196486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Some results of the activities of the sanitary-epidemiological service in environmental monitoring in the Tashkent region of the Republic of Uzbekistan].
    Usmanov UM
    Gig Sanit; 2004; (3):24-6. PubMed ID: 15197851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Is epidemiology the key to cumulative risk assessment?
    Levy JI
    Risk Anal; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1507-13. PubMed ID: 18793279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Biomarkers in terrestrial invertebrates for ecotoxicological soil risk assessment.
    Kammenga JE; Dallinger R; Donker MH; Köhler HR; Simonsen V; Triebskorn R; Weeks JM
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2000; 164():93-147. PubMed ID: 12587835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Algorithm validation for pesticide exposure risk evaluation by environmental monitoring data].
    Miraglia N; Simonelli A; Basilicata P; Genovese G; Acampora A; Sannolo N
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2007; 29(3 Suppl):367-8. PubMed ID: 18409728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Are Bt crops safe?
    Mendelsohn M; Kough J; Vaituzis Z; Matthews K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):1003-9. PubMed ID: 12949561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Biomonitoring.
    Andersen G
    NCSL Legisbrief; 2004; 12(44):1-2. PubMed ID: 15523766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Risk assessment of soil contamination in a residential area: the importance and role of human biological monitoring--a case report].
    Ewers U; Boening D; Albrecht J; Rädel R; Peter G; Uthoff T
    Gesundheitswesen; 2004; 66(8-9):536-44. PubMed ID: 15372356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. European union system for the evaluation of substances: the second version.
    Attias L; Boccardi P; Boeije G; Brooke D; de Bruijn J; Comber M; Dolan B; Fischer S; Heinemeyer G; Koch V; Lijzen J; Müller B; Murray-Smith R; Rikken M; Tadeo J; Vermeire T
    Chemosphere; 2005 Apr; 59(4):473-85. PubMed ID: 15788170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk perspective.
    Hays SM; Becker RA; Leung HW; Aylward LL; Pyatt DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 17030369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [A role of the sociohygienic monitoring system in the maintenance and promotion of the population's health (in case of the Sverdlovsk Region)].
    Nikonov BI; Kuz'min SV; Malykh OL
    Gig Sanit; 2007; (3):73-6. PubMed ID: 17658051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Evaluation of the effectiveness of human health risk-reducing measures in poor environmental areas].
    Prusakov VM; Verzhbitskaia EA; Basaraba IN; Tkachenko AV
    Gig Sanit; 2004; (5):74-7. PubMed ID: 15532508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Are CT scans carcinogenic?
    Mezrich R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Jun; 5(6):691-3. PubMed ID: 18514945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.