These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12516176)
21. An employer's exclusion of coverage for contraceptive drugs is not per se sex discrimination. Lidge EF Temple Law Rev; 2003; 76(3):533-77. PubMed ID: 16514770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. On the need for a federal conscience clause. Myers RS Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 12862052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Employe must complain to EEOC before feds force abortion payment. Geisel J Mod Healthc; 1980 Mar; 10(3):34. PubMed ID: 10245570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Contraceptive justice: why we need a male pill. Campo-Engelstein L Virtual Mentor; 2012 Feb; 14(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 23116957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Contraceptive Coverage and the Balance Between Conscience and Access. Stahl RY; Lynch HF JAMA; 2017 Dec; 318(22):2179-2180. PubMed ID: 29049513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Update: new rights for pregnant employees. Lines PM Pers J; 1979 Jan; 58(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 10239889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Senate bill prohibits discrimination on pregnancy. Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Nov; 32(5):14, 16. PubMed ID: 10304863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Law may force slash in pregnancy benefits. Geisel J Mod Healthc; 1979 Dec; 9(12):28. PubMed ID: 503019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The gender gap. Health care's next frontier. Ziegler J Bus Health; 1998 Nov; 16(11):29-34. PubMed ID: 10187549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Primum non nocere--the McCain plan for health insecurity. Blumenthal D N Engl J Med; 2008 Oct; 359(16):1645-7. PubMed ID: 18815391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Affordable Care Act's Mandate Eliminating Contraceptive Cost Sharing Influenced Choices Of Women With Employer Coverage. Carlin CS; Fertig AR; Dowd BE Health Aff (Millwood); 2016 Sep; 35(9):1608-15. PubMed ID: 27605640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. If only policy analysis were so easy. Joyce T J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):897-9. PubMed ID: 24665472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Employee benefits: no abortion benefits, no contracts. Geisel J Mod Healthc; 1980 Feb; 10(2):30. PubMed ID: 10245551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dependents' pregnancy-related medical benefits and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. Frankel GW Duke Law J; 1983 Feb; (1):134-52. PubMed ID: 10259899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Increase in obstacles to abortion: the American perspective in 2004. Donohoe M J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 2005; 60(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 16845763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mental health parity, access, and quality of care. Druss BG Med Care; 2006 Jun; 44(6):497-8. PubMed ID: 16707996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The pregnancy disability amendment: what the law provides, part II. Trotter R; Zacur SR; Greenwood W Pers Adm; 1982 Mar; 27(3):55-6, 58. PubMed ID: 10254625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The pregnancy disability amendment: what the law provides: part I. Trotter R; Zacur SR; Gatewood W Pers Adm; 1982 Feb; 27(2):47-8, 50-4. PubMed ID: 10254624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]