275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12517547)
1. Concordance with breast cancer pathology reporting practice guidelines.
Wilkinson NW; Shahryarinejad A; Winston JS; Watroba N; Edge SB
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jan; 196(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 12517547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variability in the quality of pathology reporting of margin status following breast cancer surgery.
Persing S; James TA; Mace J; Goodwin A; Geller B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3061-5. PubMed ID: 21947586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer pathology reporting practice and guidelines.
Page DL
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jan; 196(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 12517556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast Specimen Processing and Reporting With an Emphasis on Margin Evaluation: A College of American Pathologists Survey of 866 Laboratories.
Guidi AJ; Tworek JA; Mais DD; Souers RJ; Blond BJ; Brown RW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Apr; 142(4):496-506. PubMed ID: 29328775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histopathology reporting of breast cancer in Queensland: the impact on the quality of reporting as a result of the introduction of recommendations.
Austin R; Thompson B; Coory M; Walpole E; Francis G; Fritschi L
Pathology; 2009; 41(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 19404849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of Breast Cancer Surgical Pathology Reports.
Vallacha A; Haider G; Raja W; Kumar D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Mar; 19(3):853-858. PubMed ID: 29582645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer pathology practices among Medicare patients undergoing unilateral extended simple mastectomy.
Imperato PJ; Waisman J; Wallen M; Llewellyn CC; Pryor V
J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2002; 11(6):537-47. PubMed ID: 12225627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability in gross and microscopic pathology reporting in excisional biopsies of breast cancer tissue.
Apple SK
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16509839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An international survey-based study on colorectal cancer pathology reporting-guidelines versus local practice.
Urbanowicz M; Grabsch HI; Fiteni F; Liu Y; Caballero C; Fléjou JF
Virchows Arch; 2018 Dec; 473(6):697-708. PubMed ID: 30255341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The College of American Pathologists guidelines for whole slide imaging validation are feasible for pediatric pathology: a pediatric pathology practice experience.
Arnold MA; Chenever E; Baker PB; Boué DR; Fung B; Hammond S; Hendrickson BW; Kahwash SB; Pierson CR; Prasad V; Nicol KK; Barr T
Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2015; 18(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 25387255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histopathology of breast carcinoma--an audit of 50 reports in Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Mamoon N; Hassan U; Mushtaq S; Sharif MA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(1):169-72. PubMed ID: 20593952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Missing Elements in Surgical Pathology Reports: Breast, Colon and Stomach Cancers.
Kadivar M; Rahimabad PK
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(3):1469-72. PubMed ID: 27039791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI
Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical margin reporting in breast conserving surgery: Does compliance with guidelines affect re-excision and mastectomy rates?
Persing S; Jerome MA; James TA; Callas P; Mace J; Sowden M; Goodwin A; Weaver DL; Sprague BL
Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):618-22. PubMed ID: 26199197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A survey of reporting of colorectal cancer in Scotland: compliance with guidelines and effect of proforma reporting.
Woods YL; Mukhtar S; McClements P; Lang J; Steele RJ; Carey FA
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 24567415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of pathological reporting for renal cell cancer: implications for systemic therapy, prognostication and surveillance.
Shuch B; Pantuck AJ; Pouliot F; Finley DS; Said JW; Belldegrun AS; Saigal C
BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 21087450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An audit of breast cancer pathology reporting in Australia in 1995.
Kricker A; Armstrong B; Smith C; Bilous M; Camaris C; Mayer A; Psarianos T
Br J Cancer; 1999 May; 80(3-4):563-8. PubMed ID: 10408867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adequacy of surgical pathology reporting of cancer: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 86 institutions.
Idowu MO; Bekeris LG; Raab S; Ruby SG; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 134(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 20586623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathologic practice standards for breast carcinoma: tumor size, reliable data, or miscues?
Lagios MD
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jan; 196(1):91-2. PubMed ID: 12517557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
