BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1251855)

  • 21. The mode ages of women with cervical dysplasia.
    Carson HJ; DeMay RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 8355947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. A study of 34 cases.
    Lee KR; Minter LJ; Granter SR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jan; 107(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 8980364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Pap smear: take two.
    Shulman JJ; Hontz A; Sedlis A; Walters AT; Balin H; LoScuito L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Apr; 121(8):1024-8. PubMed ID: 1119496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cervicovaginal cytology in an indigent population. Comparison of results for 1964, 1981 and 1989.
    Costa MJ; Grimes C; Tackett E; Naib ZM
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 1994635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri.
    Selim MA; So-Bosita JL; Neuman MR
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1974 Nov; 139(5):697-700. PubMed ID: 4428326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cervical cytology screening history of women diagnosed with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: a case-control study.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 15471249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. No increased risk for cervical cancer after a broader definition of a negative Pap smear.
    Rebolj M; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade F; Looman C; Boer R; Habbema JD
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Dec; 123(11):2632-5. PubMed ID: 18767046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estrogenic effect in vaginal smears in cases of carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Rubio CA
    Acta Cytol; 1973; 17(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 4198740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comprehensive cytologic screening in patients undergoing voluntary abortions.
    Calanog A; Sall S; Gordon M; Sedlis A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Jan; 118(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 4808862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ of the vagina.
    Oliver JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 May; 134(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 453238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Analysis of the validity of vaginal-cervical cytologic examination in 162 pre- and post-menopausal patients].
    Martelli M; Rapezzi R; Roncone L; Davì E; Mancini L
    Minerva Ginecol; 1996 Jun; 48(6):235-8. PubMed ID: 8927283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Trends in colposcopy.
    Navarre GL
    J Reprod Med; 1981 Jan; 26(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7205805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cervical cytology in Greenland and occurrence of cervical carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, and dysplasia. Extent and impact of uncoordinated screening activity 1976-1985.
    Højgaard Nielsen N; Jensen H; Hansen PK
    Arctic Med Res; 1988 Oct; 47(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 3214508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prospective evaluation of risk of cervical cancer after cytological evidence of human papilloma virus infection.
    Mitchell H; Drake M; Medley G
    Lancet; 1986 Mar; 1(8481):573-5. PubMed ID: 2869301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Cytological diagnosis of cervical cancer in the early stages and its effect on morbidity and mortality].
    Möbius G
    Cesk Patol; 1979 Feb; 15(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 436166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Management of abnormal Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.
    Lurain JR; Gallup DG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 53(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 440652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Colposcopic evaluation of the abnormal Papanicolaou test in pregnancy.
    DePetrillo AD; Townsend DE; Morrow CP; Lickrish GM; DiSaia PJ; Roy M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Feb; 121(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 1146871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Incidence of cervical cancer following negative smear. A cohort study from Maribo County, Denmark.
    Lynge E; Poll P
    Am J Epidemiol; 1986 Sep; 124(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 3740035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Abnormal cervical smears: are we in for an epidemic?
    Wolfendale MR; King S; Usherwood MM
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Aug; 287(6391):526-8. PubMed ID: 6411205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
    van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.