These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12518911)

  • 1. Abdominal computed tomographic scan-merits and demerits over ultrasonography: evaluation of 70 cases.
    Obajimi MO; Ogunseyinde AO; Agunloye AM
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2002 Jun; 31(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 12518911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emergency department abdominal computed tomography for nontraumatic abdominal pain: optimizing utilization.
    Modahl L; Digumarthy SR; Rhea JT; Conn AK; Saini S; Lee SI
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Nov; 3(11):860-6. PubMed ID: 17412185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT of small-bowel ischemia associated with obstruction in emergency department patients: diagnostic performance evaluation.
    Sheedy SP; Earnest F; Fletcher JG; Fidler JL; Hoskin TL
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):729-36. PubMed ID: 17114622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT in the evaluation of nontraumatic abdominal pain in pregnant women.
    Lazarus E; Mayo-Smith WW; Mainiero MB; Spencer PK
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17709829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of computed tomography in family practitioners' patients with non-acute abdominal pain.
    Master SS; Longstreth GF; Liu AL
    Fam Pract; 2005 Oct; 22(5):474-7. PubMed ID: 15964875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiological imaging to improve the emergency department diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
    Rosengren D; Brown AF; Chu K
    Emerg Med Australas; 2004; 16(5-6):410-6. PubMed ID: 15537403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of acute abdominal pain: utility of a second cross-sectional imaging examination.
    Riddell AM; Khalili K
    Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):570-7. PubMed ID: 16436818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Plain abdominal radiographs and abdominal CT scans for nontraumatic abdominal pain--added value?
    Nagurney JT; Brown DF; Novelline RA; Kim J; Fischer RH
    Am J Emerg Med; 1999 Nov; 17(7):668-71. PubMed ID: 10597085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abdominal imaging studies: comparison of diagnostic accuracies resulting from ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the same individual.
    Noone TC; Semelka RC; Chaney DM; Reinhold C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jan; 22(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 14972390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of Computerized Tomography in Abdominal Pain.
    Bhatt A; Yang X; Karnik N; Sill A; Kowdley G
    Am Surg; 2018 Jun; 84(6):1091-1096. PubMed ID: 29981654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of body mass index on concordance in the interpretation of matched noncontrast and contrast abdominal pelvic computed tomographic scans in ED patients with nontraumatic abdominal pain.
    Wolfe JM; Smithline H; Lee S; Coughlin B; Polino J; Blank F
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Mar; 24(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 16490641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Justifying multidetector CT in abdominal sepsis: time for review?
    Meeson S; Alvey CM; Golding SJ
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 82(975):190-7. PubMed ID: 18955415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abdominal pain: coronal reformations from isotropic voxels with 16-section CT--reader lesion detection and interpretation time.
    Jaffe TA; Martin LC; Miller CM; Franklin KM; Merkle EM; Thompson WM; Nelson RC; DeLong DM; Paulson EK
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 17185667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic significance of ultrasonography and CT for large upper abdominal mass.
    Niu L; Hao Y; Zhou C; Dai J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2002 Sep; 115(9):1358-62. PubMed ID: 12411112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidental findings detected on emergency abdominal CT scans: a 1-year review.
    Kelly ME; Heeney A; Redmond CE; Costelloe J; Nason GJ; Ryan J; Brophy D; Winter DC
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Aug; 40(6):1853-7. PubMed ID: 25576049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mucocele of the appendix. Retrospective study of 10 cases].
    Soueï-Mhiri M; Tlili-Graies K; Ben Cherifa L; Derbel F; Hmissa S; Dahmen Y; Jeddi M
    J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 82(4):463-8. PubMed ID: 11353901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy study.
    Laméris W; van Randen A; van Es HW; van Heesewijk JP; van Ramshorst B; Bouma WH; ten Hove W; van Leeuwen MS; van Keulen EM; Dijkgraaf MG; Bossuyt PM; Boermeester MA; Stoker J;
    BMJ; 2009 Jun; 338():b2431. PubMed ID: 19561056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Radiology of acute abdominal pain in adult patients].
    Hainaux B; Borens-Fefer B
    Rev Med Brux; 2010 Sep; 31(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 21089407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening US and CT for blunt abdominal trauma: a retrospective study.
    Marco GG; Diego S; Giulio A; Luca S
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Oct; 56(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 16168270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commentary on: The accuracy of interpretation of emergency abdominal CT in adult patients who present with non-traumatic abdominal pain: results of a UK national audit.
    Anderson ID
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):52-54. PubMed ID: 27927487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.